EPYC 7F72
Xeon w7-2575X
EPYC 7F72 vs Xeon w7-2575X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7F72 vs Xeon w7-2575X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7F72 vs Xeon w7-2575X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7F72
2020Why buy it
- ✅+326.7% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 45 MB).
- ✅Draws 240W instead of 250W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-2575X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (52,840 vs 52,951).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.8 vs 31.4 PassMark/$ ($2,131 MSRP vs $1,689 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon w7-2575X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon w7-2575X
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $442 less on MSRP ($1,689 MSRP vs $2,131 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 26.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.4 vs 24.8 PassMark/$ ($1,689 MSRP vs $2,131 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (45 MB vs 192 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w7-2575X better than EPYC 7F72?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7F72 vs Xeon w7-2575X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7F72
The EPYC 7F72 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 192 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 52,840 points. Launch price was $2,450.
Xeon w7-2575X
The Xeon w7-2575X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 52,951 points. Launch price was $1,689.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7F72 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon w7-2575X offers 22 cores / 44 threads — the EPYC 7F72 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7F72 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-2575X — a 25.9% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-2575X (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 7F72 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon w7-2575X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7F72 scores 52,840 against the Xeon w7-2575X's 52,951 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon w7-2575X. L3 cache: 192 MB (total) on the EPYC 7F72 vs 45 MB on the Xeon w7-2575X.
| Feature | EPYC 7F72 | Xeon w7-2575X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+9% | 22 / 44 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.8 GHz+30% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+7% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 192 MB (total)+327% | 45 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+25500% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 52,840 | 52,951 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 19,640 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7F72 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-2575X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7F72 versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-2575X — the Xeon w7-2575X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7F72 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7F72) vs 4 (Xeon w7-2575X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7F72) vs 64 (Xeon w7-2575X) — the EPYC 7F72 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7F72) and Intel W790 (Xeon w7-2575X).
| Feature | EPYC 7F72 | Xeon w7-2575X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | DDR5-4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+100% | 2048 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+100% | 4 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+100% | 64 |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon w7-2575X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon w7-2575X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7F72) vs true (Xeon w7-2575X). Direct competitor: EPYC 7F72 rivals Xeon Platinum 8260; Xeon w7-2575X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.
| Feature | EPYC 7F72 | Xeon w7-2575X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7F72 was priced at $2131, while the Xeon w7-2575X came in at $1689. On launch pricing ($2131 vs $1689), Xeon w7-2575X was $442 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7F72 delivers 24.8 pts/$ vs 31.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-2575X — making the Xeon w7-2575X the 23.3% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7F72 | Xeon w7-2575X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2131 | $1689-21% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.8 | 31.4+27% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7F72 and Xeon w7-2575X
