EPYC 7F72 vs Xeon Platinum 8358

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7F72

24 Cores48 Thrd240 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2020

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Platinum 8358

32 Cores64 Thrd250 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2021

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7F72 vs Xeon Platinum 8358 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7F72

24 / 48

52,840

0.0%

Ryzen 9 8945HS

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Xeon Platinum 8358

32 / 64

54,416

+3.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7F72 vs Xeon Platinum 8358 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7F72 vs Xeon Platinum 8358: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7F72

2020

Why buy it

✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 192 MB vs 48 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
✅Costs $2,476 less on MSRP ($2,131 MSRP vs $4,607 MSRP).
✅Delivers 109.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.8 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($2,131 MSRP vs $4,607 MSRP).
✅Draws 240W instead of 250W, a 10W reduction.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (52,840 vs 54,416).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Platinum 8358

2021

Why buy it

✅+3% higher PassMark.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (48 MB vs 192 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 24.8 PassMark/$ ($4,607 MSRP vs $2,131 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7F72 better than Xeon Platinum 8358?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 7F72 is ahead with a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8358 pulls ahead with 3% better PassMark. EPYC 7F72 also has the bigger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 48 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8358 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7F72 is the better buy right now. EPYC 7F72 comes in $2,476 cheaper on MSRP at $2,131 MSRP versus $4,607 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Platinum 8358 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 3% better PassMark. It is also 109.9% better value on MSRP (24.8 vs 11.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8358 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020), more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 24/48, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7F72 vs Xeon Platinum 8358 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7F72

The EPYC 7F72 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 192 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 52,840 points. Launch price was $2,450.

Xeon Platinum 8358

The Xeon Platinum 8358 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 54,416 points. Launch price was $3,950.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7F72 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8358 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8358 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7F72 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8358 — a 8.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 7F72 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The EPYC 7F72 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8358 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7F72 scores 52,840 against the Xeon Platinum 8358's 54,416 — a 2.9% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8358. L3 cache: 192 MB (total) on the EPYC 7F72 vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8358.

Feature	EPYC 7F72	Xeon Platinum 8358
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	32 / 64+33%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+9%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+23%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	192 MB (total)+300%	48 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	52,840	54,416+3%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7F72 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8358 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7F72) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8358) — the EPYC 7F72 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7F72) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8358).

Feature	EPYC 7F72	Xeon Platinum 8358
Socket	SP3	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+100%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Platinum 8358 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7F72 rivals Xeon Platinum 8260; Xeon Platinum 8358 rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	EPYC 7F72	Xeon Platinum 8358
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7F72 was priced at $2131, while the Xeon Platinum 8358 came in at $4607. On launch pricing ($2131 vs $4607), EPYC 7F72 was $2476 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7F72 delivers 24.8 pts/$ vs 11.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8358 — making the EPYC 7F72 the 70.9% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7F72	Xeon Platinum 8358
MSRP	$2131-54%	$4607
Performance per Dollar	24.8+110%	11.8
Release Date	2020	2021

Search EPYC 7F72 on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8358 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.