EPYC 7F72 vs Ryzen 9 8945HX

AMD

EPYC 7F72

24 Cores48 Thrd240 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2020
EPYC family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 9 8945HX

16 Cores32 Thrd55 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025
Ryzen family
·······

EPYC 7F72 vs Ryzen 9 8945HX Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7F72 vs Ryzen 9 8945HX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7F72 vs Ryzen 9 8945HX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7F72

2020

Why buy it

  • +200% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 64 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
  • 357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 8945HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (52,840 vs 53,211).
  • Launch MSRP is still $2,131 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 8945HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 336.4% higher power demand at 240W vs 55W.
  • Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 8945HX moves to FL1 and DDR5.

Ryzen 9 8945HX

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +10.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 55W instead of 240W, a 185W reduction.
  • Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 610M, while EPYC 7F72 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 192 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7F72, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 8945HX better than EPYC 7F72?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7F72 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 8945HX is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 8945HX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 8945HX is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 9 8945HX is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7F72 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 9 8945HX comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $2,131 MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7F72 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (24.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 9 8945HX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2020), a healthier platform with FL1 and DDR5 instead of SP3, more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 24/48, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7F72 vs Ryzen 9 8945HX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 7F72

The EPYC 7F72 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 192 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 52,840 points. Launch price was $2,450.

AMD

Ryzen 9 8945HX

The Ryzen 9 8945HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-04-01. It is based on the Dragon Range (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 53,211 points. Launch price was $700.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7F72 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen 9 8945HX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7F72 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7F72 versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 8945HX — a 37.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 8945HX (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 7F72 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 8945HX uses Dragon Range (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7F72 scores 52,840 against the Ryzen 9 8945HX's 53,211 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 8945HX. L3 cache: 192 MB (total) on the EPYC 7F72 vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 8945HX.

FeatureEPYC 7F72Ryzen 9 8945HX
Cores / Threads
24 / 48+50%
16 / 32
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz
5.4 GHz+46%
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+28%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
192 MB (total)+200%
64 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+51100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
7 nm, 14 nm
5 nm-29%
Architecture
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Dragon Range (2025)
PassMark
52,840
53,211
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7F72 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 8945HX uses FL1 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7F72 versus 5600 on the Ryzen 9 8945HX — the Ryzen 9 8945HX supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7F72 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 96 4166.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7F72) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 8945HX). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7F72) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 8945HX) — the EPYC 7F72 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7F72) and FL1 (Ryzen 9 8945HX).

FeatureEPYC 7F72Ryzen 9 8945HX
Socket
SP3
FL1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
3200
5600+75%
Max RAM Capacity
4096+4167%
96
RAM Channels
8+300%
2
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+357%
28
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 8945HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 8945HX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7F72) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen 9 8945HX). The Ryzen 9 8945HX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 610M), while the EPYC 7F72 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 7F72 rivals Xeon Platinum 8260; Ryzen 9 8945HX rivals Core Ultra 9 275HX.

FeatureEPYC 7F72Ryzen 9 8945HX
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
AMD Radeon 610M
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V