EPYC 7F72 vs Xeon Platinum 8360Y
EPYC 7F72
Xeon Platinum 8360Y
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7F72
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8360Y
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 7F72 | Xeon Platinum 8360Y |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($2,131) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($5,383) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Ice Lake-SP (2021) / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 7F72 | Xeon Platinum 8360Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+147%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($2,131) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($5,383) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7F72 and Xeon Platinum 8360Y
EPYC 7F72
The EPYC 7F72 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 192 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 52,840 points. Launch price was $2,450.
Xeon Platinum 8360Y
The Xeon Platinum 8360Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 36 cores and 72 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 54 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 54,078 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7F72 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8360Y offers 36 cores / 72 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8360Y has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7F72 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8360Y — a 5.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 7F72 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 7F72 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8360Y uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7F72 scores 52,840 against the Xeon Platinum 8360Y's 54,078 — a 2.3% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8360Y. L3 cache: 192 MB (total) on the EPYC 7F72 vs 54 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8360Y.
| Feature | EPYC 7F72 | Xeon Platinum 8360Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 36 / 72+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+6% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+33% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 192 MB (total)+256% | 54 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 52,840 | 54,078+2% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7F72 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8360Y uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7F72) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8360Y) — the EPYC 7F72 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7F72) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8360Y).
| Feature | EPYC 7F72 | Xeon Platinum 8360Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+100% | 64 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Platinum 8360Y supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7F72 rivals Xeon Platinum 8260; Xeon Platinum 8360Y rivals EPYC 7543.
| Feature | EPYC 7F72 | Xeon Platinum 8360Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7F72 launched at $2131 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8360Y debuted at $5383.
| Feature | EPYC 7F72 | Xeon Platinum 8360Y |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2131-60% | $5383 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2131 | — |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7F72 and Xeon Platinum 8360Y
