EPYC 7F72 vs Xeon w5-2565X
EPYC 7F72
Xeon w5-2565X
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7F72
Performance Per Dollar Xeon w5-2565X
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 7F72 | Xeon w5-2565X |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,131) | ✅ More affordable ($1,389) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 7F72 | Xeon w5-2565X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+52%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,131) | ✅ More affordable ($1,389) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7F72 and Xeon w5-2565X
EPYC 7F72
The EPYC 7F72 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 192 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 52,840 points. Launch price was $2,450.
Xeon w5-2565X
The Xeon w5-2565X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 52,378 points. Launch price was $1,339.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7F72 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon w5-2565X offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the EPYC 7F72 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7F72 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w5-2565X — a 25.9% clock advantage for the Xeon w5-2565X (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The EPYC 7F72 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon w5-2565X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7F72 scores 52,840 against the Xeon w5-2565X's 52,378 — a 0.9% lead for the EPYC 7F72. L3 cache: 192 MB (total) on the EPYC 7F72 vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon w5-2565X.
| Feature | EPYC 7F72 | Xeon w5-2565X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+33% | 18 / 36 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.8 GHz+30% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 192 MB (total)+412% | 37.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 52,840 | 52,378 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7F72 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w5-2565X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7F72 versus 4800 on the Xeon w5-2565X — the Xeon w5-2565X supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7F72) vs 112 (Xeon w5-2565X) — the EPYC 7F72 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7F72) and W790 (Xeon w5-2565X).
| Feature | EPYC 7F72 | Xeon w5-2565X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+14% | 112 |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon w5-2565X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon w5-2565X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7F72 rivals Xeon Platinum 8260; Xeon w5-2565X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.
| Feature | EPYC 7F72 | Xeon w5-2565X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7F72 launched at $2131 MSRP, while the Xeon w5-2565X debuted at $1389. At current prices ($2131 vs $1389), the Xeon w5-2565X is $742 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7F72 delivers 24.8 pts/$ vs 37.7 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-2565X — making the Xeon w5-2565X the 41.3% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7F72 | Xeon w5-2565X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2131 | $1389-35% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2131 | $1389-35% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.8 | 37.7+52% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7F72 and Xeon w5-2565X
