EPYC 7F72
EPYC 4545P
EPYC 7F72 vs EPYC 4545P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7F72 vs EPYC 4545P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7F72 vs EPYC 4545P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7F72
2020Why buy it
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (192 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4545P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (52,840 vs 54,255).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.8 vs 98.8 PassMark/$ ($2,131 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌269.2% higher power demand at 240W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 4545P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
EPYC 4545P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,582 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $2,131 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 298.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 98.8 vs 24.8 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $2,131 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 240W, a 175W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 192 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4545P better than EPYC 7F72?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7F72 vs EPYC 4545P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 7F72
The EPYC 7F72 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 192 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 52,840 points. Launch price was $2,450.
EPYC 4545P
The EPYC 4545P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 54,255 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7F72 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the EPYC 4545P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7F72 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7F72 versus 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4545P — a 37.4% clock advantage for the EPYC 4545P (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 7F72 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the EPYC 4545P uses Grado (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7F72 scores 52,840 against the EPYC 4545P's 54,255 — a 2.6% lead for the EPYC 4545P. L3 cache: 192 MB (total) on the EPYC 7F72 vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4545P.
| Feature | EPYC 7F72 | EPYC 4545P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 5.4 GHz+46% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+7% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 192 MB (total)+200% | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+51100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Grado (2025) |
| PassMark | 52,840 | 54,255+3% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7F72 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 4545P uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7F72 versus 5600 on the EPYC 4545P — the EPYC 4545P supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7F72 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7F72) vs 2 (EPYC 4545P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7F72) vs 28 (EPYC 4545P) — the EPYC 7F72 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7F72) and AM5 (EPYC 4545P).
| Feature | EPYC 7F72 | EPYC 4545P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 5600+75% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096+2033% | 192 |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+357% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Only the EPYC 4545P has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 4545P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7F72) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4545P). The EPYC 4545P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 7F72 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 7F72 rivals Xeon Platinum 8260; EPYC 4545P rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.
| Feature | EPYC 7F72 | EPYC 4545P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | AMD Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7F72 was priced at $2131, while the EPYC 4545P came in at $549. On launch pricing ($2131 vs $549), EPYC 4545P was $1582 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7F72 delivers 24.8 pts/$ vs 98.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 4545P — making the EPYC 4545P the 119.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7F72 | EPYC 4545P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2131 | $549-74% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.8 | 98.8+298% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7F72 and EPYC 4545P
