
EPYC 7502 vs Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

EPYC 7502

Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7502
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 7502 | Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,299) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Strix Halo (2025) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 7502 | Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,299) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7502 and Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

EPYC 7502
The EPYC 7502 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 52,107 points. Launch price was $2,600.

Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 51,646 points. Launch price was $500.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7502 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7502 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7502 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 — a 41.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 7502 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7502 scores 52,107 against the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395's 51,646 — a 0.9% lead for the EPYC 7502. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7502 vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395.
| Feature | EPYC 7502 | Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+100% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.35 GHz | 5.1 GHz+52% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3 GHz+20% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+100% | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| PassMark | 52,107 | 51,646 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7502 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7502 versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 — the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 supports 85.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7502 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7502) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7502) vs 16 (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395) — the EPYC 7502 offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7502) and FP11 (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395).
| Feature | EPYC 7502 | Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | FP11 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 8000+150% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096+3100% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 8+100% | 4 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+700% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7502) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395). The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 8060S), while the EPYC 7502 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 7502 rivals Xeon Gold 6338; Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 rivals Core Ultra 7 255HX.
| Feature | EPYC 7502 | Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | AMD Radeon 8060S |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7502 launched at $2600 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 debuted at $0. At current prices ($1299 vs $0), the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is $1299 cheaper.
| Feature | EPYC 7502 | Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2600 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1299 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.1 | — |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















