Ryzen 9 8940HX vs Xeon 6511P

Ryzen 9 8940HX vs Xeon 6511P Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 9 8940HX

16 / 32

51,161

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon 6511P

16 / 32

51,286

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 9 8940HX vs Xeon 6511P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 9 8940HX vs Xeon 6511P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 9 8940HX

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 55W instead of 150W, a 95W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Xeon 6511P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (16,000 vs 20,000).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6511P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 136 PCIe lanes.

Xeon 6511P

2025

Why buy it

✅+25% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 136 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅385.7% more PCIe lanes (136 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 8940HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $815 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 8940HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌172.7% higher power demand at 150W vs 55W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 8940HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6511P better than Ryzen 9 8940HX?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon 6511P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 8940HX is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6511P is the stronger fit. You are getting 25% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6511P is the better buy right now. Xeon 6511P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $815 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 25% better Geekbench multi-core. The compromise is that Ryzen 9 8940HX is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 14.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (62.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6511P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 9 8940HX vs Xeon 6511P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 9 8940HX

The Ryzen 9 8940HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 April 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Dragon Range (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 51,161 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon 6511P

The Xeon 6511P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 72 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 51,286 points. Launch price was $815.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 9 8940HX and Xeon 6511P share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 8940HX versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon 6511P — a 23.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 8940HX (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen 9 8940HX uses the Dragon Range (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon 6511P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 8940HX scores 51,161 against the Xeon 6511P's 51,286 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon 6511P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,800 vs 1,800, a 43.5% lead for the Ryzen 9 8940HX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 16,000 vs 20,000 (22.2% advantage for the Xeon 6511P). L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 8940HX vs 72 MB (total) on the Xeon 6511P.

Feature	Ryzen 9 8940HX	Xeon 6511P
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	16 / 32
Boost Clock	5.3 GHz+26%	4.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+4%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)	72 MB (total)+13%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm	Intel 3 nm-40%
Architecture	Dragon Range (2025)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	51,161	51,286
Geekbench 6 Single	2,800+56%	1,800
Geekbench 6 Multi	16,000	20,000+25%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 8940HX uses the FL1 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6511P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 9 8940HX versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6511P — the Xeon 6511P supports 23.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6511P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 6300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 8940HX) vs 8 (Xeon 6511P). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 8940HX) vs 136 (Xeon 6511P) — the Xeon 6511P offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD FL1 (Ryzen 9 8940HX) and C741 (Xeon 6511P).

Feature	Ryzen 9 8940HX	Xeon 6511P
Socket	FL1	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200	DDR5-6400+23%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	4096 GB+6300%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	136+386%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen 9 8940HX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6511P). The Ryzen 9 8940HX includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), while the Xeon 6511P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon 6511P targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon 6511P rivals EPYC 9684X.