Ryzen 9 8940HX vs Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 9 8940HX vs Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 9 8940HX vs Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 9 8940HX

2025

Why buy it

✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (51,161 vs 51,646).

Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

2025

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 better than Ryzen 9 8940HX?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 9 8940HX is ahead with a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 9 8940HX vs Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 9 8940HX

The Ryzen 9 8940HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 April 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Dragon Range (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 51,161 points. Launch price was $499.

Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 51,646 points. Launch price was $500.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 9 8940HX and Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 8940HX versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 — a 3.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 8940HX (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 9 8940HX uses the Dragon Range (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 8940HX scores 51,161 against the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395's 51,646 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395. Both processors carry 64 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Ryzen 9 8940HX	Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	16 / 32
Boost Clock	5.3 GHz+4%	5.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)	64 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm	4 nm-20%
Architecture	Dragon Range (2025)	Strix Halo (2025)
PassMark	51,161	51,646
Geekbench 6 Single	2,800	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	16,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 8940HX uses the FL1 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 9 8940HX versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 — the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 supports 53.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 8940HX) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 8940HX) vs 16 (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395) — the Ryzen 9 8940HX offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD FL1 (Ryzen 9 8940HX) and FP11 (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395).

Feature	Ryzen 9 8940HX	Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
Socket	FL1	FP11
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200	8000+54%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	128 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28+75%	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen 9 8940HX) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon 610M (Ryzen 9 8940HX) and AMD Radeon 8060S (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 rivals Core Ultra 7 255HX.