
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Xeon Gold 6252
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs Xeon Gold 6252 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs Xeon Gold 6252 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs Xeon Gold 6252: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 150W, a 142W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon Gold 6252 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 36 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6252, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads.
Xeon Gold 6252
2019Why buy it
- ✅+123.4% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,148 vs 27,318).
- ❌1775% higher power demand at 150W vs 8W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS moves to FP7/FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS better than Xeon Gold 6252?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs Xeon Gold 6252 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 27,318 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6252
The Xeon Gold 6252 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,148 points. Launch price was $3,655.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6252 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6252 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6252 — a 33.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (base: 4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6252 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS scores 27,318 against the Xeon Gold 6252's 27,148 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6252.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS | Xeon Gold 6252 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 24 / 48+200% |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+41% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+90% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 35.75 MB+123% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB | 24 MB+200% |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 27,318 | 27,148 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,605 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,348 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses the FP7/FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6252 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS | Xeon Gold 6252 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7/FP8 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS) / not specified (Xeon Gold 6252). The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Xeon Gold 6252 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS | Xeon Gold 6252 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 780M | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













