
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 140W, a 112W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,051 vs 22,066).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $799 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 140W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 better than Ryzen Threadripper 1920?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (Zen 5) (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,051 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen Threadripper 1920
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,066 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 — a 27.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 uses the Strix Point (Zen 5) (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 22,051 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1920's 22,066 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+32% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.2 GHz+60% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 32 MB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Strix Point (Zen 5) (2025) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 22,051 | 22,066 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | SP3r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 was priced at $0, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 came in at $799. On launch pricing ($0 vs $799), Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 was $799 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | — | 27.6 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














