Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
VS
Core Ultra 9 285H

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 vs Core Ultra 9 285H

AMD

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

12 Cores24 Thrd28 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2024
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 9 285H

16 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 9 285H

#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
121%
#31
Ryzen 5 230
MSRP: $200|Avg: $190
112%
#36
Core i5-11500B
MSRP: $185|Avg: $185
102%
#40
Core Ultra 9 285H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#42
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A
97%
#49
Core i9-12900HX
MSRP: $606|Avg: N/A
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core Ultra 9 285H is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.7% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightRyzen AI 9 HX 375Core Ultra 9 285H
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-H (2025) / 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightRyzen AI 9 HX 375Core Ultra 9 285H
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Core Ultra 9 285H

AMD

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,585 points. Launch price was $499.

Intel

Core Ultra 9 285H

The Core Ultra 9 285H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 34,327 points. Launch price was $651.

Processing Power

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Core Ultra 9 285H offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 9 285H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 versus 5.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285H — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285H (base: 2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses the Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Core Ultra 9 285H uses Arrow Lake-H (2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 scores 34,585 against the Core Ultra 9 285H's 34,327 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 22,246 vs 26,500 (17.5% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,865 vs 2,720, a 5.2% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,100 vs 15,330 (1.5% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285H). L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 vs 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 285H.

FeatureRyzen AI 9 HX 375Core Ultra 9 285H
Cores / Threads
12 / 24
16 / 16+33%
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz
5.4 GHz+6%
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.9 GHz+45%
L3 Cache
16 MB
24 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
3 MB (per core)+200%
Process
4 nm
3 nm-25%
Architecture
Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)
Arrow Lake-H (2025)
PassMark
34,585
34,327
Cinebench R23 Multi
22,246
26,500+19%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,865+5%
2,720
Geekbench 6 Multi
15,100
15,330+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 9 285H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR5x-8000, DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375) vs 28 (Core Ultra 9 285H) — the Core Ultra 9 285H offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375) and SoC (Core Ultra 9 285H).

FeatureRyzen AI 9 HX 375Core Ultra 9 285H
Socket
FP8
FCBGA2049
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5x-8000, DDR5-5600
LPDDR5x-8400, DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB+33%
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
28+75%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 9 285H). Both include integrated graphics Radeon 890M (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375) and Intel Arc 140T (8 Xe-cores) (Core Ultra 9 285H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 targets AI-Notebook, Core Ultra 9 285H targets High-end Mobile Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 370; Core Ultra 9 285H rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 375.

FeatureRyzen AI 9 HX 375Core Ultra 9 285H
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 890M
Intel Arc 140T (8 Xe-cores)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
AMD-V, AMD-Vi
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
AI-Notebook
High-end Mobile Workstation