Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Xeon Gold 6238R
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 vs Xeon Gold 6238R Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 vs Xeon Gold 6238R FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 vs Xeon Gold 6238R: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 165W, a 137W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 890M, while Xeon Gold 6238R needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (15,100 vs 21,433).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 39 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6238R, which brings 28 cores / 56 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Gold 6238R
2020Why buy it
- ✅+41.9% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+140.6% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 28 cores / 56 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅200% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $2,612 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌489.3% higher power demand at 165W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 better than Xeon Gold 6238R?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 vs Xeon Gold 6238R Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,585 points. Launch price was $499.
Xeon Gold 6238R
The Xeon Gold 6238R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 34,751 points. Launch price was $2,612.
Processing Power
The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6238R offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon Gold 6238R has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6238R — a 24.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses the Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6238R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 scores 34,585 against the Xeon Gold 6238R's 34,751 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 6238R. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,100 vs 21,433 (34.7% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6238R). L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 vs 38.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6238R.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 | Xeon Gold 6238R |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 28 / 56+133% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+27% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz+10% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 38.5 MB+141% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 28 MB+2700% |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 34,585 | 34,751 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 22,246 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,865 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,100 | 21,433+42% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6238R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5x-8000, DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Gold 6238R — the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 supports 172.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6238R supports up to 1 TB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6238R). PCIe lanes: 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6238R) — the Xeon Gold 6238R offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375) and C621,C622,C624,C627,C628 (Xeon Gold 6238R).
| Feature | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 | Xeon Gold 6238R |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5x-8000, DDR5-5600+173% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 1 TB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 48+200% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6238R). The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 890M), while the Xeon Gold 6238R requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 targets AI-Notebook, Xeon Gold 6238R targets Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 370; Xeon Gold 6238R rivals Xeon Gold 6248R.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 | Xeon Gold 6238R |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 890M | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | AI-Notebook | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 was priced at $0, while the Xeon Gold 6238R came in at $2612. On launch pricing ($0 vs $2612), Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 was $2612 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 | Xeon Gold 6238R |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $2612 |
| Performance per Dollar | — | 13.3 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Xeon Gold 6238R
