Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 vs Xeon W-3265M

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 vs Xeon W-3265M Performance Spectrum

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

12 / 24

34,585

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Xeon W-3265M

24 / 48

35,506

+2.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 vs Xeon W-3265M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 vs Xeon W-3265M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 205W, a 177W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 890M, while Xeon W-3265M needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3265M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (34,585 vs 35,506).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 33 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3265M, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Xeon W-3265M

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +21.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+106.3% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $6,300 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌632.1% higher power demand at 205W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-3265M better than Ryzen AI 9 HX 375?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-3265M makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-3265M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 21.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3265M is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.7% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 106.3% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-3265M is the better buy right now. Xeon W-3265M comes in at an unclear MSRP at $6,300 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 21.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019) and a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 vs Xeon W-3265M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,585 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon W-3265M

The Xeon W-3265M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 35,506 points. Launch price was $6,353.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon W-3265M offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon W-3265M has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3265M — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses the Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon W-3265M uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 scores 34,585 against the Xeon W-3265M's 35,506 — a 2.6% lead for the Xeon W-3265M. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 vs 33 MB on the Xeon W-3265M.

Feature	Ryzen AI 9 HX 375	Xeon W-3265M
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	24 / 48+100%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+11%	4.6 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.7 GHz+35%
L3 Cache	16 MB	33 MB+106%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	24 MB+2300%
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	34,585	35,506+3%
Cinebench R23 Multi	22,246	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,865	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,100	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3265M uses LGA3647 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5x-8000, DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 versus 2933 on the Xeon W-3265M — the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 supports 172.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3265M supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375) vs 6 (Xeon W-3265M). PCIe lanes: 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375) vs 64 (Xeon W-3265M) — the Xeon W-3265M offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375) and C620 (Xeon W-3265M).

Feature	Ryzen AI 9 HX 375	Xeon W-3265M
Socket	FP8	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5x-8000, DDR5-5600+173%	2933
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	1024 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	64+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3265M). The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 890M), while the Xeon W-3265M requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 targets AI-Notebook. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 370; Xeon W-3265M rivals EPYC 7402.

Feature	Ryzen AI 9 HX 375	Xeon W-3265M
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon 890M	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, AMD-Vi	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	AI-Notebook	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 was priced at $0, while the Xeon W-3265M came in at $6300. On launch pricing ($0 vs $6300), Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 was $6300 cheaper.

Feature	Ryzen AI 9 HX 375	Xeon W-3265M
MSRP	$0-100%	$6300
Performance per Dollar	—	5.6
Release Date	2024	2019

Search Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 on Amazon

Search Xeon W-3265M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.