Ryzen AI Max 390
VS
Ryzen 7 8840HX

Ryzen AI Max 390 vs Ryzen 7 8840HX

AMD

Ryzen AI Max 390

12 Cores24 Thrd55 WWMax: 5 GHz2025
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 8840HX

12 Cores24 Thrd55 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 8840HX

#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
119%
#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
118%
#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
114%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
112%
#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
104%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
104%
#192
Ryzen 7 8840HX
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Ryzen 7 8840HX delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Ryzen AI Max 390 in both compute-intensive tasks (1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightRyzen AI Max 390Ryzen 7 8840HX
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Strix Halo (2025) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Dragon Range (2025) / 5 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightRyzen AI Max 390Ryzen 7 8840HX
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI Max 390 and Ryzen 7 8840HX

AMD

Ryzen AI Max 390

The Ryzen AI Max 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 41,834 points. Launch price was $499.

AMD

Ryzen 7 8840HX

The Ryzen 7 8840HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 April 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Dragon Range (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 42,275 points. Launch price was $499.

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen AI Max 390 and Ryzen 7 8840HX share an identical 12-core/24-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max 390 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8840HX — a 2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8840HX (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen AI Max 390 uses the Strix Halo (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 8840HX uses Dragon Range (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI Max 390 scores 41,834 against the Ryzen 7 8840HX's 42,275 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen 7 8840HX. Both processors carry 64 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureRyzen AI Max 390Ryzen 7 8840HX
Cores / Threads
12 / 24
12 / 24
Boost Clock
5 GHz
5.1 GHz+2%
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+10%
2.9 GHz
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)
64 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
4 nm-20%
5 nm
Architecture
Strix Halo (2025)
Dragon Range (2025)
PassMark
41,834
42,275+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen AI Max 390 uses the FP11 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 8840HX uses FL1 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max 390 versus 5600 on the Ryzen 7 8840HX — the Ryzen AI Max 390 supports 35.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen AI Max 390 supports up to 128 of RAM compared to 64 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen AI Max 390) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 8840HX). Both provide 28 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Strix Halo (Ryzen AI Max 390) and FP8,FP7 (Ryzen 7 8840HX).

FeatureRyzen AI Max 390Ryzen 7 8840HX
Socket
FP11
FL1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
8000+43%
5600
Max RAM Capacity
128+100%
64
RAM Channels
4+100%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
28
28
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen AI Max 390 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. Both include integrated graphics AMD Radeon 8050S (Ryzen AI Max 390) and AMD Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 8840HX) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI Max 390 rivals Apple M4 Max; Ryzen 7 8840HX rivals Core i7-13700H.

FeatureRyzen AI Max 390Ryzen 7 8840HX
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon 8050S
AMD Radeon 780M
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V