Ryzen AI Max 390 vs EPYC 7F52
Ryzen AI Max 390
EPYC 7F52
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7F52
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen AI Max 390 | EPYC 7F52 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,826) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Strix Halo (2025) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen AI Max 390 | EPYC 7F52 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,826) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI Max 390 and EPYC 7F52
Ryzen AI Max 390
The Ryzen AI Max 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 41,834 points. Launch price was $499.
EPYC 7F52
The EPYC 7F52 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 41,388 points. Launch price was $3,100.
Processing Power
The Ryzen AI Max 390 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the EPYC 7F52 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7F52 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max 390 versus 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 7F52 — a 24.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max 390 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen AI Max 390 uses the Strix Halo (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 7F52 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI Max 390 scores 41,834 against the EPYC 7F52's 41,388 — a 1.1% lead for the Ryzen AI Max 390. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max 390 vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7F52.
| Feature | Ryzen AI Max 390 | EPYC 7F52 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 16 / 32+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+28% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Architecture | Strix Halo (2025) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 41,834+1% | 41,388 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen AI Max 390 uses the FP11 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7F52 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max 390 versus 3200 on the EPYC 7F52 — the Ryzen AI Max 390 supports 85.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7F52 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen AI Max 390) vs 8 (EPYC 7F52). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen AI Max 390) vs 128 (EPYC 7F52) — the EPYC 7F52 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Strix Halo (Ryzen AI Max 390) and SP3 (EPYC 7F52).
| Feature | Ryzen AI Max 390 | EPYC 7F52 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP11 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 8000+150% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 4096+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 8+100% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 128+357% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen AI Max 390 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. The Ryzen AI Max 390 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 8050S), while the EPYC 7F52 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI Max 390 rivals Apple M4 Max; EPYC 7F52 rivals Xeon Gold 6248.
| Feature | Ryzen AI Max 390 | EPYC 7F52 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon 8050S | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen AI Max 390 launched at $0 MSRP, while the EPYC 7F52 debuted at $3100. At current prices ($0 vs $1826), the Ryzen AI Max 390 is $1826 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen AI Max 390 | EPYC 7F52 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $3100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $1826 |
| Performance per Dollar | — | 22.7 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen AI Max 390 and EPYC 7F52
