
Ryzen AI Max 390 vs Xeon W-3275

Ryzen AI Max 390

Xeon W-3275
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3275
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen AI Max 390 | Xeon W-3275 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,550) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Strix Halo (2025) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen AI Max 390 | Xeon W-3275 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,550) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI Max 390 and Xeon W-3275

Ryzen AI Max 390
The Ryzen AI Max 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 41,834 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon W-3275
The Xeon W-3275 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 41,267 points. Launch price was $4,449.
Processing Power
The Ryzen AI Max 390 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon W-3275 offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon W-3275 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max 390 versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3275 — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max 390 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen AI Max 390 uses the Strix Halo (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon W-3275 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI Max 390 scores 41,834 against the Xeon W-3275's 41,267 — a 1.4% lead for the Ryzen AI Max 390. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max 390 vs 38.5 MB on the Xeon W-3275.
| Feature | Ryzen AI Max 390 | Xeon W-3275 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 28 / 56+133% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+9% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+28% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+66% | 38.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 28 MB+2700% |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Strix Halo (2025) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 41,834+1% | 41,267 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen AI Max 390 uses the FP11 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3275 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max 390 versus 3200 on the Xeon W-3275 — the Ryzen AI Max 390 supports 85.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3275 supports up to 1024 of RAM compared to 128 — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen AI Max 390) vs 6 (Xeon W-3275). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen AI Max 390) vs 64 (Xeon W-3275) — the Xeon W-3275 offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Strix Halo (Ryzen AI Max 390) and C621 (Xeon W-3275).
| Feature | Ryzen AI Max 390 | Xeon W-3275 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP11 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 8000+150% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 1024+700% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 6+50% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 64+129% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen AI Max 390 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max 390) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3275). The Ryzen AI Max 390 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 8050S), while the Xeon W-3275 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI Max 390 rivals Apple M4 Max; Xeon W-3275 rivals Threadripper 3970X.
| Feature | Ryzen AI Max 390 | Xeon W-3275 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon 8050S | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen AI Max 390 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3275 debuted at $4449. At current prices ($0 vs $1550), the Ryzen AI Max 390 is $1550 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen AI Max 390 | Xeon W-3275 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $4449 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $1550 |
| Performance per Dollar | — | 26.6 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















