Ryzen AI Max 390
VS
Xeon W-3275

Ryzen AI Max 390 vs Xeon W-3275

AMD

Ryzen AI Max 390

12 Cores24 Thrd55 WWMax: 5 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Xeon W-3275

28 Cores56 Thrd205 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3275

#484
EPYC 7773X
MSRP: $8800|Avg: $8800
112%
#485
Xeon Gold 6258R
MSRP: $3950|Avg: $1400
110%
#486
EPYC 9175F
MSRP: $4256|Avg: $3703
110%
#488
EPYC 9534
MSRP: $8803|Avg: $2999
109%
#489
EPYC 9654
MSRP: $11805|Avg: $5345
109%
#490
EPYC 7H12
MSRP: $6950|Avg: $1340
108%
#491
EPYC 7742
MSRP: $6950|Avg: $800
108%
#492
Xeon Platinum 8352M
MSRP: $4471|Avg: $4471
107%
#493
Xeon Platinum 8570
MSRP: $9595|Avg: $9595
105%
#494
EPYC 9184X
MSRP: $4928|Avg: $3750
104%
#495
Xeon Platinum 8470
MSRP: $9359|Avg: $9359
103%
#496
Xeon E7-8857 v2
MSRP: $3838|Avg: $2995
102%
#497
Xeon Gold 6148
MSRP: $3072|Avg: $290
102%
#498
Xeon E5-1681 V3
MSRP: $1589|Avg: $200
101%
#499
Xeon W-3275
MSRP: $4449|Avg: $1550
100%
#500
Xeon Gold 6138
MSRP: $2612|Avg: $300
99%
#501
Xeon E5-2690 v4
MSRP: $2090|Avg: $389
99%
#502
Xeon Platinum 8362
MSRP: $6236|Avg: $5740
98%
#503
Xeon W-3275M
MSRP: $4449|Avg: $4449
98%
#504
Xeon E5-2660 v3
MSRP: $1445|Avg: $150
97%
#505
Xeon E5-2679 v4
MSRP: $2702|Avg: $500
96%
#506
Xeon E5-2680 v3
MSRP: $1745|Avg: $212
92%
#507
Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
MSRP: $5945|Avg: $7000
91%
#508
Xeon E7-8895 v2
MSRP: $6841|Avg: $65
90%
#509
EPYC 9684X
MSRP: $14756|Avg: $14756
89%
#509
EPYC 9754
MSRP: $11900|Avg: $10631
89%
#511
Xeon D-1587
MSRP: $1652|Avg: $1443
89%
#512
Xeon E5-2687W v4
MSRP: $2141|Avg: $1138
89%
#513
Xeon W-3265
MSRP: $3684|Avg: $3400
88%
#514
Xeon E5-2658A V3
MSRP: $1832|Avg: $200
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen AI Max 390 (2025) utilizes 4 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightRyzen AI Max 390Xeon W-3275
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,550)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Strix Halo (2025) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon W-3275 (2019) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4-2933, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightRyzen AI Max 390Xeon W-3275
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,550)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI Max 390 and Xeon W-3275

AMD

Ryzen AI Max 390

The Ryzen AI Max 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 41,834 points. Launch price was $499.

Intel

Xeon W-3275

The Xeon W-3275 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 41,267 points. Launch price was $4,449.

Processing Power

The Ryzen AI Max 390 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon W-3275 offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon W-3275 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max 390 versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3275 — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max 390 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen AI Max 390 uses the Strix Halo (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon W-3275 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI Max 390 scores 41,834 against the Xeon W-3275's 41,267 — a 1.4% lead for the Ryzen AI Max 390. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max 390 vs 38.5 MB on the Xeon W-3275.

FeatureRyzen AI Max 390Xeon W-3275
Cores / Threads
12 / 24
28 / 56+133%
Boost Clock
5 GHz+9%
4.6 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+28%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)+66%
38.5 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
28 MB+2700%
Process
4 nm-71%
14 nm
Architecture
Strix Halo (2025)
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark
41,834+1%
41,267
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen AI Max 390 uses the FP11 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3275 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max 390 versus 3200 on the Xeon W-3275 — the Ryzen AI Max 390 supports 85.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3275 supports up to 1024 of RAM compared to 128 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen AI Max 390) vs 6 (Xeon W-3275). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen AI Max 390) vs 64 (Xeon W-3275) — the Xeon W-3275 offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Strix Halo (Ryzen AI Max 390) and C621 (Xeon W-3275).

FeatureRyzen AI Max 390Xeon W-3275
Socket
FP11
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
8000+150%
3200
Max RAM Capacity
128
1024+700%
RAM Channels
4
6+50%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
28
64+129%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen AI Max 390 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max 390) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3275). The Ryzen AI Max 390 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 8050S), while the Xeon W-3275 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI Max 390 rivals Apple M4 Max; Xeon W-3275 rivals Threadripper 3970X.

FeatureRyzen AI Max 390Xeon W-3275
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon 8050S
None
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen AI Max 390 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3275 debuted at $4449. At current prices ($0 vs $1550), the Ryzen AI Max 390 is $1550 cheaper.

FeatureRyzen AI Max 390Xeon W-3275
MSRP
$0-100%
$4449
Avg Price (30d)
$0-100%
$1550
Performance per Dollar
26.6
Release Date
2025
2019