Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Xeon w7-2475X

Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Xeon w7-2475X Performance Spectrum

Ryzen AI Max+ 395

16 / 32

55,025

+3.4%

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen 7 8840HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon w7-2475X

20 / 40

53,211

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Xeon w7-2475X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Xeon w7-2475X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen AI Max+ 395

2025

Why buy it

✅+3.4% higher PassMark.
✅+70.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 38 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 225W, a 170W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 8060S, while Xeon w7-2475X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-2475X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w7-2475X, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.

Xeon w7-2475X

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅600% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (53,211 vs 55,025).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (38 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,789 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max+ 395 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌309.1% higher power demand at 225W vs 55W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI Max+ 395 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI Max+ 395 better than Xeon w7-2475X?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon w7-2475X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.4% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 70.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 38 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon w7-2475X is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen AI Max+ 395 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,789 MSRP, and it still gives you 3.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon w7-2475X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon w7-2475X is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (29.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI Max+ 395 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023), 70.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 38 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 20/40. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Xeon w7-2475X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen AI Max+ 395

The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 55,025 points. Launch price was $450.

Xeon w7-2475X

The Xeon w7-2475X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 53,211 points. Launch price was $1,789.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon w7-2475X offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon w7-2475X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-2475X — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses the Strix Halo (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon w7-2475X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 scores 55,025 against the Xeon w7-2475X's 53,211 — a 3.4% lead for the Ryzen AI Max+ 395. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon w7-2475X.

Feature	Ryzen AI Max+ 395	Xeon w7-2475X
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	20 / 40+25%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+6%	4.8 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+15%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+71%	37.5 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm-43%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Strix Halo (2025)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	55,025+3%	53,211

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses the FP11 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-2475X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 versus 4800 on the Xeon w7-2475X — the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w7-2475X supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) vs 8 (Xeon w7-2475X). PCIe lanes: 16 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) vs 112 (Xeon w7-2475X) — the Xeon w7-2475X offers 96 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP11 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) and W790 (Xeon w7-2475X).

Feature	Ryzen AI Max+ 395	Xeon w7-2475X
Socket	FP11	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	8000+67%	4800
Max RAM Capacity	128	4096+3100%
RAM Channels	4	8+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	112+600%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon w7-2475X). The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 8060S), while the Xeon w7-2475X requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 rivals Core Ultra 9 285HX; Xeon w7-2475X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

Feature	Ryzen AI Max+ 395	Xeon w7-2475X
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon 8060S	None
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 was priced at $0, while the Xeon w7-2475X came in at $1789. On launch pricing ($0 vs $1789), Ryzen AI Max+ 395 was $1789 cheaper.

Feature	Ryzen AI Max+ 395	Xeon w7-2475X
MSRP	$0-100%	$1789
Performance per Dollar	—	29.7
Release Date	2025	2023

Search Ryzen AI Max+ 395 on Amazon

Search Xeon w7-2475X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.