Ryzen Embedded R1305G
VS
FX-4170

Ryzen Embedded R1305G vs FX-4170

AMD

Ryzen Embedded R1305G

2 Cores4 Thrd8 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2020
VS
AMD

FX-4170

4 Cores4 Thrd125 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Ryzen Embedded R1305G is positioned at rank 856 and the FX-4170 is on rank 796, so the FX-4170 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Embedded R1305G

#844
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1400%
#845
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1380%
#846
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1267%
#847
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1261%
#848
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1250%
#850
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1207%
#851
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1157%
#852
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1155%
#853
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1124%
#856
Ryzen Embedded R1305G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
100%
#863
Pentium Dual Core T2390
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
98%
#867
Core i7-1160G7
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar FX-4170

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
15680%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
14816%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10758%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3241%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2567%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2246%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1286%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1269%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1156%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1156%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1143%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1112%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1096%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1092%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1082%
#294
Core i9-7920X
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $236
99%
#394
Ryzen 3 2200GE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#796
FX-4170
MSRP: $157|Avg: $23
100%
#798
Athlon II X3 415e
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
99%
#799
Core i5-2300
MSRP: $177|Avg: $17
99%
#800
Core i7-4820K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $40
99%
#802
Core i7-3770K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $75
98%
#803
Core i5-4460T
MSRP: $187|Avg: $30
98%
#804
Core i3-3220
MSRP: $117|Avg: $88
98%
#805
Core i7-3770T
MSRP: $278|Avg: $105
98%
#807
Core i5-7442EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
97%
#808
Pentium G620
MSRP: $64|Avg: $12
97%
#809
Pentium G645T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen Embedded R1305G (2020) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightRyzen Embedded R1305GFX-4170
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($23)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-4170 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightRyzen Embedded R1305GFX-4170
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+116%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($23)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Embedded R1305G and FX-4170

AMD

Ryzen Embedded R1305G

The Ryzen Embedded R1305G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,142 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

FX-4170

The FX-4170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 February 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,121 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Ryzen Embedded R1305G packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-4170 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-4170 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1305G versus 4.3 GHz on the FX-4170 — a 42.3% clock advantage for the FX-4170 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded R1305G uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-4170 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded R1305G scores 3,142 against the FX-4170's 3,121 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen Embedded R1305G. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R1305G vs 8192 kB on the FX-4170.

FeatureRyzen Embedded R1305GFX-4170
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz
4.3 GHz+54%
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
4.2 GHz+180%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
8192 kB+100%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
4096 kB+700%
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Zen (2017−2020)
Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark
3,142
3,121
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Embedded R1305G uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-4170 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen Embedded R1305GFX-4170
Socket
FP5
AM3+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen Embedded R1305G launched at $150 MSRP, while the FX-4170 debuted at $157. At current prices ($50 vs $23), the FX-4170 is $27 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Embedded R1305G delivers 62.8 pts/$ vs 135.7 pts/$ for the FX-4170 — making the FX-4170 the 73.4% better value option.

FeatureRyzen Embedded R1305GFX-4170
MSRP
$150-4%
$157
Avg Price (30d)
$50
$23-54%
Performance per Dollar
62.8
135.7+116%
Release Date
2020
2012