Ryzen Embedded R1305G vs FX-4320
Ryzen Embedded R1305G
FX-4320
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Ryzen Embedded R1305G is positioned at rank 856 and the FX-4320 is on rank 950, so the Ryzen Embedded R1305G offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Embedded R1305G
Performance Per Dollar FX-4320
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen Embedded R1305G | FX-4320 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($50) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($100) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen Embedded R1305G | FX-4320 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+99%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($50) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($100) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Embedded R1305G and FX-4320
Ryzen Embedded R1305G
The Ryzen Embedded R1305G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,142 points. Launch price was $69.
FX-4320
The FX-4320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4096 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 3,150 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Embedded R1305G packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-4320 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-4320 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1305G versus 4.1 GHz on the FX-4320 — a 37.7% clock advantage for the FX-4320 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded R1305G uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-4320 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded R1305G scores 3,142 against the FX-4320's 3,150 — a 0.3% lead for the FX-4320. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R1305G vs 4096 kB on the FX-4320.
| Feature | Ryzen Embedded R1305G | FX-4320 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz | 4.1 GHz+46% |
| Base Clock | 1.5 GHz | 4 GHz+167% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 4096 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 4096 kB+700% |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Vishera (2012−2015) |
| PassMark | 3,142 | 3,150 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Embedded R1305G uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-4320 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen Embedded R1305G | FX-4320 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP5 | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Embedded R1305G launched at $150 MSRP, while the FX-4320 debuted at $250. At current prices ($50 vs $100), the Ryzen Embedded R1305G is $50 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Embedded R1305G delivers 62.8 pts/$ vs 31.5 pts/$ for the FX-4320 — making the Ryzen Embedded R1305G the 66.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Embedded R1305G | FX-4320 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-40% | $250 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-50% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 62.8+99% | 31.5 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Embedded R1305G and FX-4320
