Ryzen Embedded R1305G vs FX-770K

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Ryzen Embedded R1305G is positioned at rank #856 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Embedded R1305G

#844

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1400%

#845

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1380%

#846

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

1267%

#847

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

1261%

#848

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

1250%

#850

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

1207%

#851

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

1157%

#852

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

1155%

#853

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

1124%

#856

Ryzen Embedded R1305G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

100%

#863

Pentium Dual Core T2390

MSRP: $86|Avg: $5

98%

#867

Core i7-1160G7

MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A

98%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen Embedded R1305G (2020) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Ryzen Embedded R1305G	FX-770K
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	✅ More affordable ($50)	⚠️ Higher cost ($59)
Longevity	✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-770K (2014) relies on 28 nm technology and DDR3-2133, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Ryzen Embedded R1305G	FX-770K
Cost Efficiency	✅ Better overall value (+17%)	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($50)	⚠️ Higher cost ($59)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen Embedded R1305G Benchmark Check

FX-770K Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Embedded R1305G and FX-770K

Ryzen Embedded R1305G

The Ryzen Embedded R1305G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,142 points. Launch price was $69.

FX-770K

The FX-770K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Dezembro 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,172 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Embedded R1305G packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-770K offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-770K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1305G versus 3.9 GHz on the FX-770K — a 32.8% clock advantage for the FX-770K (base: 1.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded R1305G uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-770K uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded R1305G scores 3,142 against the FX-770K's 3,172 — a 1% lead for the FX-770K.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded R1305G	FX-770K
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	3.9 GHz+39%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	3.5 GHz+133%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	4 MB+700%
Process	14 nm-50%	28 nm
Architecture	Zen (2017−2020)	Kaveri (2014−2015)
PassMark	3,142	3,172

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Embedded R1305G uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-770K uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded R1305G	FX-770K
Socket	FP5	FM2+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen Embedded R1305G launched at $150 MSRP, while the FX-770K debuted at $0. At current prices ($50 vs $59), the Ryzen Embedded R1305G is $9 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Embedded R1305G delivers 62.8 pts/$ vs 53.8 pts/$ for the FX-770K — making the Ryzen Embedded R1305G the 15.6% better value option.