Ryzen Embedded R2544 vs U300

Ryzen Embedded R2544 vs U300 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen Embedded R2544

4 / 8

8,486

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

U300

5 / 6

8,492

+0.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Embedded R2544 vs U300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Embedded R2544 vs U300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Embedded R2544

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 55W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (8,486 vs 8,492).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $280 MSRP, while U300 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌Older platform position on FP5 with DDR4, while U300 moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

U300

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of FP5 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Embedded R2544 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌22.2% higher power demand at 55W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded R2544 better than U300?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen Embedded R2544 is ahead with a 3.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, U300 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. U300 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, U300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 5 cores and 6 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Embedded R2544 is the better buy right now. Ryzen Embedded R2544 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $280 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that U300 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (30.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

U300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of FP5, 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 5 cores / 6 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen Embedded R2544 vs U300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen Embedded R2544

The Ryzen Embedded R2544 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.35 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,486 points. Launch price was $149.

U300

The U300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 5 cores and 6 threads. Max frequency: 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 8,492 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Embedded R2544 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the U300 offers 5 cores / 6 threads — the U300 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R2544 versus 4.4 GHz on the U300 — a 17.3% clock advantage for the U300. The Ryzen Embedded R2544 is built on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded R2544 scores 8,486 against the U300's 8,492 — a 0.1% lead for the U300. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R2544 vs 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the U300.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded R2544	U300
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	5 / 6+25%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	4.4 GHz+19%
Base Clock	3.35 GHz	—
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8 MB Intel® Smart Cache+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	—
Process	12 nm	Intel 7 nm-42%
Architecture	Picasso (2019−2022)	—
PassMark	8,486	8,492

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Embedded R2544 uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the U300 uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.