Core i5-1140G7 vs Ryzen Embedded R2544

Core i5-1140G7 vs Ryzen Embedded R2544 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-1140G7

4 / 8

8,471

0.0%

8,486

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-1140G7 vs Ryzen Embedded R2544 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-1140G7 vs Ryzen Embedded R2544: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-1140G7

2020

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Draws 5W instead of 45W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (8,471 vs 8,486).

Ryzen Embedded R2544

2022

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $280 MSRP, while Core i5-1140G7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌800% higher power demand at 45W vs 5W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded R2544 better than Core i5-1140G7?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-1140G7 is ahead with a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded R2544 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark. Core i5-1140G7 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded R2544 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Embedded R2544 is the better buy right now. Ryzen Embedded R2544 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $280 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i5-1140G7 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (30.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded R2544 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2020) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-1140G7 vs Ryzen Embedded R2544 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-1140G7

The Core i5-1140G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 5 MB. Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1598. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 MB + 8 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,471 points. Launch price was $149.

Ryzen Embedded R2544

The Ryzen Embedded R2544 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.35 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,486 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-1140G7 and Ryzen Embedded R2544 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i5-1140G7 versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R2544 — a 12.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-1140G7 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.35 GHz). The Core i5-1140G7 uses the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Ryzen Embedded R2544 uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1140G7 scores 8,471 against the Ryzen Embedded R2544's 8,486 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen Embedded R2544. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Core i5-1140G7 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R2544.

Feature	Core i5-1140G7	Ryzen Embedded R2544
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+14%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	3.35 GHz+86%
L3 Cache	8 MB+100%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	5 MB+900%	512 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm SuperFin-17%	12 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021)	Picasso (2019−2022)
PassMark	8,471	8,486

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-1140G7 uses the FCBGA1598 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R2544 uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.