Core i5-1140G7 vs EPYC 8324PN

Core i5-1140G7 vs EPYC 8324PN Performance Spectrum

Core i5-1140G7

4 / 8

8,471

+1.1%

8,375

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-1140G7 vs EPYC 8324PN FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-1140G7 vs EPYC 8324PN: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-1140G7

2020

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 5W instead of 130W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 8324PN across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8324PN, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads.
❌Older platform position on FCBGA1598 with DDR4, while EPYC 8324PN moves to SP6 and DDR5.

EPYC 8324PN

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1598 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (8,375 vs 8,471).
❌2500% higher power demand at 130W vs 5W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-1140G7 better than EPYC 8324PN?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 8324PN makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-1140G7 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-1140G7 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-1140G7 still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-1140G7 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.1% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8324PN makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA1598, and 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 8 MB. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-1140G7 vs EPYC 8324PN Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-1140G7

The Core i5-1140G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 5 MB. Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1598. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 MB + 8 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,471 points. Launch price was $149.

EPYC 8324PN

The EPYC 8324PN is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.05 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 8,375 points. Launch price was $2,125.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-1140G7 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the EPYC 8324PN offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 8324PN has 28 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i5-1140G7 versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 8324PN — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-1140G7 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.05 GHz). The Core i5-1140G7 uses the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the EPYC 8324PN uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1140G7 scores 8,471 against the EPYC 8324PN's 8,375 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i5-1140G7. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Core i5-1140G7 vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8324PN.

Feature	Core i5-1140G7	EPYC 8324PN
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	32 / 64+700%
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+40%	3 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.05 GHz+14%
L3 Cache	8 MB	128 MB (total)+1500%
L2 Cache	5 MB+400%	1 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm SuperFin	5 nm-50%
Architecture	Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021)	Siena (2023−2024)
PassMark	8,471+1%	8,375

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-1140G7 uses the FCBGA1598 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 8324PN uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.