Core i5-1140G7 vs Xeon E5-2628 V3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-1140G7 vs Xeon E5-2628 V3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-1140G7 vs Xeon E5-2628 V3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-1140G7

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 5W instead of 85W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2628 V3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2628 V3, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.

Xeon E5-2628 V3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (8,447 vs 8,471).
❌1600% higher power demand at 85W vs 5W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-1140G7 better than Xeon E5-2628 V3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2628 V3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-1140G7 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-1140G7 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-1140G7 still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-1140G7 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-1140G7 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-1140G7 vs Xeon E5-2628 V3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-1140G7

The Core i5-1140G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 5 MB. Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1598. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 MB + 8 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,471 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2628 V3

The Xeon E5-2628 V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 8,447 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-1140G7 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2628 V3 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2628 V3 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i5-1140G7 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2628 V3 — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-1140G7 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-1140G7 uses the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Xeon E5-2628 V3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1140G7 scores 8,471 against the Xeon E5-2628 V3's 8,447 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-1140G7. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Core i5-1140G7 vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2628 V3.

Feature	Core i5-1140G7	Xeon E5-2628 V3
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+40%	3 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.5 GHz+39%
L3 Cache	8 MB	20 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache	5 MB	256K (per core)+5020%
Process	10 nm SuperFin-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	8,471	8,447

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-1140G7 uses the FCBGA1598 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2628 V3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.