Core i5-1140G7 vs Core i7-8809G

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-1140G7 vs Core i7-8809G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-1140G7 vs Core i7-8809G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-1140G7

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 5W instead of 100W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-8809G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Core i7-8809G

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (8,448 vs 8,471).
❌Launch MSRP is still $450 MSRP, while Core i5-1140G7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1900% higher power demand at 100W vs 5W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-1140G7 better than Core i7-8809G?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-8809G is ahead with a 5.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-1140G7 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-1140G7 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-1140G7 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core i5-1140G7 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $450 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. Core i7-8809G only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-1140G7 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2018) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-1140G7 vs Core i7-8809G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-1140G7

The Core i5-1140G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 5 MB. Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1598. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 MB + 8 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,471 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-8809G

The Core i7-8809G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake G (2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2270. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 8,448 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-1140G7 and Core i7-8809G share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i5-1140G7 versus 4.2 GHz on the Core i7-8809G — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i5-1140G7 uses the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Core i7-8809G uses Kaby Lake G (2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1140G7 scores 8,471 against the Core i7-8809G's 8,448 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-1140G7. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Core i5-1140G7 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-8809G.

Feature	Core i5-1140G7	Core i7-8809G
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz	4.2 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	3.1 GHz+72%
L3 Cache	8 MB	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	5 MB	256K (per core)+5020%
Process	10 nm SuperFin-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021)	Kaby Lake G (2018)
PassMark	8,471	8,448

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-1140G7 uses the FCBGA1598 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-8809G uses FCBGA2270 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.