Core i7-8809G vs Ryzen Embedded R2544

Core i7-8809G vs Ryzen Embedded R2544 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-8809G

4 / 8

8,448

0.0%

8,486

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-8809G vs Ryzen Embedded R2544 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-8809G vs Ryzen Embedded R2544: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-8809G

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (8,448 vs 8,486).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.8 vs 30.3 PassMark/$ ($450 MSRP vs $280 MSRP).
❌122.2% higher power demand at 100W vs 45W.

Ryzen Embedded R2544

2022

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($280 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
✅Delivers 61.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.3 vs 18.8 PassMark/$ ($280 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 100W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-8809G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded R2544 better than Core i7-8809G?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-8809G is ahead with a 7.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded R2544 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark. Core i7-8809G also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded R2544 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Embedded R2544 is the better buy right now. Ryzen Embedded R2544 comes in $170 cheaper on MSRP at $280 MSRP versus $450 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-8809G is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 61.4% better value on MSRP (30.3 vs 18.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded R2544 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2018) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-8809G vs Ryzen Embedded R2544 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-8809G

The Core i7-8809G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake G (2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2270. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 8,448 points. Launch price was $149.

Ryzen Embedded R2544

The Ryzen Embedded R2544 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.35 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,486 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-8809G and Ryzen Embedded R2544 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i7-8809G versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R2544 — a 12.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-8809G (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.35 GHz). The Core i7-8809G uses the Kaby Lake G (2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R2544 uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-8809G scores 8,448 against the Ryzen Embedded R2544's 8,486 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen Embedded R2544. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-8809G vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R2544.

Feature	Core i7-8809G	Ryzen Embedded R2544
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+14%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz	3.35 GHz+8%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+100%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	12 nm-14%
Architecture	Kaby Lake G (2018)	Picasso (2019−2022)
PassMark	8,448	8,486

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-8809G uses the FCBGA2270 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R2544 uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-8809G	Ryzen Embedded R2544
Socket	FCBGA2270	FP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-8809G was priced at $450, while the Ryzen Embedded R2544 came in at $280. On launch pricing ($450 vs $280), Ryzen Embedded R2544 was $170 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-8809G delivers 18.8 pts/$ vs 30.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded R2544 — making the Ryzen Embedded R2544 the 47% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-8809G	Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP	$450	$280-38%
Performance per Dollar	18.8	30.3+61%
Release Date	2018	2022

Search Core i7-8809G on Amazon

Search Ryzen Embedded R2544 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.