Core i7-8809G vs U300

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-8809G vs U300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-8809G vs U300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-8809G

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (8,448 vs 8,492).
❌Launch MSRP is still $450 MSRP, while U300 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌81.8% higher power demand at 100W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on FCBGA2270 with DDR4, while U300 moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

U300

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 55W instead of 100W, a 45W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2270 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-8809G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is U300 better than Core i7-8809G?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-8809G is ahead with a 11.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, U300 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, U300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 5 cores and 6 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

U300 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. U300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $450 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. Core i7-8809G only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

U300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2018), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA2270, and more multi-core headroom with 5 cores / 6 threads instead of 4/8. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-8809G vs U300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-8809G

The Core i7-8809G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake G (2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2270. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 8,448 points. Launch price was $149.

U300

The U300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 5 cores and 6 threads. Max frequency: 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 8,492 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-8809G packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the U300 offers 5 cores / 6 threads — the U300 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i7-8809G versus 4.4 GHz on the U300 — a 4.7% clock advantage for the U300. The Core i7-8809G is built on the Kaby Lake G (2018) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-8809G scores 8,448 against the U300's 8,492 — a 0.5% lead for the U300. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-8809G vs 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the U300.

Feature	Core i7-8809G	U300
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	5 / 6+25%
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz	4.4 GHz+5%
Base Clock	3.1 GHz	—
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	14 nm	Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture	Kaby Lake G (2018)	—
PassMark	8,448	8,492

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-8809G uses the FCBGA2270 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the U300 uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.