Core i7-8809G vs Xeon E5-2428L

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-8809G vs Xeon E5-2428L FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-8809G vs Xeon E5-2428L: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-8809G

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $242 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $692 MSRP).
✅Delivers 52.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.8 vs 12.3 PassMark/$ ($450 MSRP vs $692 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (8,448 vs 8,500).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 15 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2428L, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
❌66.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 60W.

Xeon E5-2428L

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
✅Draws 60W instead of 100W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-8809G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.3 vs 18.8 PassMark/$ ($692 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-8809G better than Xeon E5-2428L?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2428L makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-8809G is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2428L is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-8809G is the better buy right now. Core i7-8809G comes in $242 cheaper on MSRP at $450 MSRP versus $692 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2428L is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 52.8% better value on MSRP (18.8 vs 12.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-8809G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-8809G vs Xeon E5-2428L Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-8809G

The Core i7-8809G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake G (2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2270. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 8,448 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2428L

The Xeon E5-2428L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,500 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-8809G packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2428L offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2428L has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i7-8809G versus 2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2428L — a 71% clock advantage for the Core i7-8809G (base: 3.1 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i7-8809G uses the Kaby Lake G (2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2428L uses Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-8809G scores 8,448 against the Xeon E5-2428L's 8,500 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5-2428L. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-8809G vs 15360 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2428L.

Feature	Core i7-8809G	Xeon E5-2428L
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+110%	2 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+72%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	15360 kB (total)+88%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake G (2018)	Sandy Bridge-EN (2012)
PassMark	8,448	8,500

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-8809G uses the FCBGA2270 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2428L uses LGA1356 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-8809G	Xeon E5-2428L
Socket	FCBGA2270	LGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-8809G was priced at $450, while the Xeon E5-2428L came in at $692. On launch pricing ($450 vs $692), Core i7-8809G was $242 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-8809G delivers 18.8 pts/$ vs 12.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2428L — making the Core i7-8809G the 41.8% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-8809G	Xeon E5-2428L
MSRP	$450-35%	$692
Performance per Dollar	18.8+53%	12.3
Release Date	2018	2012

Search Core i7-8809G on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2428L on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.