Ryzen Embedded V1807B vs Xeon E3-1230 v6

Ryzen Embedded V1807B vs Xeon E3-1230 v6 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen Embedded V1807B

4 / 8

8,069

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E3-1230 v6

4 / 8

8,113

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Embedded V1807B vs Xeon E3-1230 v6 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Embedded V1807B vs Xeon E3-1230 v6: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Embedded V1807B

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 72W, a 27W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (8,069 vs 8,113).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1230 v6 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E3-1230 v6

2017

Why buy it

✅+300% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

❌60% higher power demand at 72W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1230 v6 better than Ryzen Embedded V1807B?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1230 v6 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen Embedded V1807B is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E3-1230 v6 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1230 v6 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1230 v6 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Xeon E3-1230 v6 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Embedded V1807B only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded V1807B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen Embedded V1807B vs Xeon E3-1230 v6 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen Embedded V1807B

The Ryzen Embedded V1807B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.35 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,069 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1230 v6

The Xeon E3-1230 v6 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 72 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 8,113 points. Launch price was $250.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen Embedded V1807B and Xeon E3-1230 v6 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V1807B versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E3-1230 v6 — a 2.6% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1230 v6 (base: 3.35 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded V1807B uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1230 v6 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded V1807B scores 8,069 against the Xeon E3-1230 v6's 8,113 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E3-1230 v6. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V1807B vs 8 MB on the Xeon E3-1230 v6.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded V1807B	Xeon E3-1230 v6
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz	3.9 GHz+3%
Base Clock	3.35 GHz	3.5 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	8 MB+300%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Zen (2017−2020)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	8,069	8,113

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Embedded V1807B uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1230 v6 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.