Ryzen Embedded V3C48
VS
Core Ultra 9 288V

Ryzen Embedded V3C48 vs Core Ultra 9 288V

AMD

Ryzen Embedded V3C48

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2022
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 9 288V

8 Cores8 Thrd30 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 9 288V

#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
119%
#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
116%
#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
114%
#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
114%
#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
110%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
108%
#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
100%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core Ultra 9 288V delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightRyzen Embedded V3C48Core Ultra 9 288V
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($600)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Rembrandt (2022) / 6 nm)
✨ Modern (Lunar Lake (2024) / 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightRyzen Embedded V3C48Core Ultra 9 288V
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($600)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Embedded V3C48 and Core Ultra 9 288V

AMD

Ryzen Embedded V3C48

The Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,203 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Core Ultra 9 288V

The Core Ultra 9 288V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 30 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,280 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Ryzen Embedded V3C48 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, matching the Core Ultra 9 288V's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 versus 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 288V — a 29.2% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 288V (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded V3C48 uses the Rembrandt (2022) architecture (6 nm), while the Core Ultra 9 288V uses Lunar Lake (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 scores 20,203 against the Core Ultra 9 288V's 20,280 — a 0.4% lead for the Core Ultra 9 288V. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 288V.

FeatureRyzen Embedded V3C48Core Ultra 9 288V
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 8
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz
5.1 GHz+34%
Base Clock
3.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)+33%
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
2.5 MB (per core)+400%
Process
6 nm
3 nm-50%
Architecture
Rembrandt (2022)
Lunar Lake (2024)
PassMark
20,203
20,280
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,300
Geekbench 6 Single
2,800
Geekbench 6 Multi
10,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Embedded V3C48 uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 9 288V uses FCBGA2833 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen Embedded V3C48Core Ultra 9 288V
Socket
FP7
FCBGA2833
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5X-8533
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen Embedded V3C48) / true (Core Ultra 9 288V). The Core Ultra 9 288V includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc 140V), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureRyzen Embedded V3C48Core Ultra 9 288V
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Arc 140V
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true