Ryzen Embedded V3C48 vs Ryzen 5 230

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 5 230

#18

Ryzen 5 8500G

MSRP: $179|Avg: $150

119%

#27

Core Ultra 7 265HX

MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A

108%

#31

Ryzen 5 230

MSRP: $200|Avg: $190

100%

#36

Core i5-11500B

MSRP: $185|Avg: $185

91%

#42

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A

87%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Ryzen 5 230 leads in gaming performance. However, the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.1% greater multi-core processing power.

Insight	Ryzen Embedded V3C48	Ryzen 5 230
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($190)
Longevity	✨ Modern (Rembrandt (2022) / 6 nm)	✨ Modern (Hawk Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Insight	Ryzen Embedded V3C48	Ryzen 5 230
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($190)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen Embedded V3C48 Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 230 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Embedded V3C48 and Ryzen 5 230

Ryzen Embedded V3C48

The Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,203 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen 5 230

The Ryzen 5 230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,186 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Embedded V3C48 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 230 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 230 — a 25.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 230 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded V3C48 uses the Rembrandt (2022) architecture (6 nm), while the Ryzen 5 230 uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 scores 20,203 against the Ryzen 5 230's 20,186 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen Embedded V3C48. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded V3C48	Ryzen 5 230
Cores / Threads	8 / 16+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz	4.9 GHz+29%
Base Clock	3.3 GHz	3.5 GHz+6%
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	6 nm	4 nm-33%
Architecture	Rembrandt (2022)	Hawk Point (2024−2025)
PassMark	20,203	20,186

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Embedded V3C48 uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 230 uses FP8 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.