Ryzen Embedded V3C48 vs Xeon D-1747NTE

Ryzen Embedded V3C48 vs Xeon D-1747NTE Performance Spectrum

Ryzen Embedded V3C48

8 / 16

20,203

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon D-1747NTE

10 / 20

20,279

+0.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Embedded V3C48 vs Xeon D-1747NTE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Embedded V3C48 vs Xeon D-1747NTE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Embedded V3C48

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 80W, a 35W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2227 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (20,203 vs 20,279).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1747NTE, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.

Xeon D-1747NTE

2022

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌77.8% higher power demand at 80W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on FCBGA2227 with DDR4, while Ryzen Embedded V3C48 moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded V3C48 better than Xeon D-1747NTE?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1747NTE makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1747NTE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Embedded V3C48 still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen Embedded V3C48 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded V3C48 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA2227. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen Embedded V3C48 vs Xeon D-1747NTE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen Embedded V3C48

The Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,203 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon D-1747NTE

The Xeon D-1747NTE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,279 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Embedded V3C48 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon D-1747NTE offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon D-1747NTE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1747NTE — a 8.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is built on the Rembrandt (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 scores 20,203 against the Xeon D-1747NTE's 20,279 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon D-1747NTE. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 vs 15 MB on the Xeon D-1747NTE.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded V3C48	Xeon D-1747NTE
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	10 / 20+25%
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+9%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+32%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)+7%	15 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	—
Process	6 nm-40%	10 nm
Architecture	Rembrandt (2022)	—
PassMark	20,203	20,279

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Embedded V3C48 uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1747NTE uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.