Ryzen Embedded V3C48 vs Xeon E5-4667 v4

Ryzen Embedded V3C48 vs Xeon E5-4667 v4 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen Embedded V3C48

8 / 16

20,203

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-4667 v4

18 / 36

20,319

+0.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Embedded V3C48 vs Xeon E5-4667 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Embedded V3C48 vs Xeon E5-4667 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Embedded V3C48

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 135W, a 90W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4667 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (20,203 vs 20,319).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 45 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4667 v4, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.

Xeon E5-4667 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+181.3% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.

Trade-offs

❌200% higher power demand at 135W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen Embedded V3C48 moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-4667 v4 better than Ryzen Embedded V3C48?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4667 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-4667 v4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4667 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 181.3% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-4667 v4 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-4667 v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Embedded V3C48 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2016) and a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen Embedded V3C48 vs Xeon E5-4667 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen Embedded V3C48

The Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,203 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-4667 v4

The Xeon E5-4667 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 4.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,319 points. Launch price was $5,729.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Embedded V3C48 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-4667 v4 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-4667 v4 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-4667 v4 — a 23.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded V3C48 uses the Rembrandt (2022) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon E5-4667 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 scores 20,203 against the Xeon E5-4667 v4's 20,319 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5-4667 v4. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 vs 45 MB on the Xeon E5-4667 v4.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded V3C48	Xeon E5-4667 v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	18 / 36+125%
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+27%	3 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+50%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	45 MB+181%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	4.5 MB+800%
Process	6 nm-57%	14 nm
Architecture	Rembrandt (2022)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	20,203	20,319

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Embedded V3C48 uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4667 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.