Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs Xeon Gold 5317
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Xeon Gold 5317
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Gold 5317
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | Xeon Gold 5317 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($300) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,100) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Ice Lake-SP (2021) / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | Xeon Gold 5317 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+267%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($300) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,100) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Xeon Gold 5317
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,487 points. Launch price was $999.
Xeon Gold 5317
The Xeon Gold 5317 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,448 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5317 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5317 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5317 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X scores 27,487 against the Xeon Gold 5317's 27,448 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5317.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | Xeon Gold 5317 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+33% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+11% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+13% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+78% | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 27,487 | 27,448 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,040 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X uses the SP3r2 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5317 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | Xeon Gold 5317 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3r2 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 4 | — |
| ECC Support | ✅ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 64 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X) / not specified (Xeon Gold 5317). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 1950X targets Workstation.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | Xeon Gold 5317 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X launched at $999 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 5317 debuted at $1088. At current prices ($300 vs $1100), the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is $800 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X delivers 91.6 pts/$ vs 25.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5317 — making the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X the 114.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | Xeon Gold 5317 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999-8% | $1088 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300-73% | $1100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 91.6+266% | 25.0 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Xeon Gold 5317
