Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs Xeon W-3323

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs Xeon W-3323 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

16 / 32

27,487

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Xeon W-3323

12 / 24

27,822

+1.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs Xeon W-3323 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs Xeon W-3323: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
✅Draws 180W instead of 220W, a 40W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (27,487 vs 27,822).
❌
5.3% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$949 MSRP

Xeon W-3323

2021

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($949 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
❌22.2% higher power demand at 220W vs 180W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-3323 better than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is ahead with a 13.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3323 pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark. Ryzen Threadripper 1950X also has the bigger cache pool with 77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3323 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-3323 is the better buy right now. Xeon W-3323 comes in $50 cheaper on MSRP at $949 MSRP versus $999 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 13.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 6.6% better value on MSRP (29.3 vs 27.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-3323 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs Xeon W-3323 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,487 points. Launch price was $999.

Xeon W-3323

The Xeon W-3323 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 220 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,822 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon W-3323 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon W-3323 — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-3323 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X scores 27,487 against the Xeon W-3323's 27,822 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon W-3323. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3323.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper 1950X	Xeon W-3323
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+33%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	4 GHz+3%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz	3.5 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	32 MB+78%	18 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Zen (2017−2020)	Ice Lake-W (2021)
PassMark	27,487	27,822+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,040	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	9,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X uses the SP3r2 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3323 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper 1950X	Xeon W-3323
Socket	SP3r2	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	—
RAM Channels	4	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	64	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X) / not specified (Xeon W-3323). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 1950X targets Workstation.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper 1950X	Xeon W-3323
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	—
Target Use	Workstation	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X was priced at $999, while the Xeon W-3323 came in at $949. On launch pricing ($999 vs $949), Xeon W-3323 was $50 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X delivers 27.5 pts/$ vs 29.3 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3323 — making the Xeon W-3323 the 6.3% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper 1950X	Xeon W-3323
MSRP	$999	$949-5%
Performance per Dollar	27.5	29.3+7%
Release Date	2017	2021

Search Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on Amazon

Search Xeon W-3323 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.