
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6246R
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
2018Why buy it
- ✅+81.5% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+79% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6246R across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,299 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6246R mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌22% higher power demand at 250W vs 205W.
Xeon Gold 6246R
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 205W instead of 250W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,000 vs 29,045).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
2018Xeon Gold 6246R
2020Why buy it
- ✅+81.5% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+79% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 205W instead of 250W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6246R across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,299 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6246R mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌22% higher power demand at 250W vs 205W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,000 vs 29,045).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6246R better than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | Xeon Gold 6246R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 177 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | Xeon Gold 6246R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 404 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 473 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 424 FPS | 391 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 299 FPS | 275 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 295 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 201 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | Xeon Gold 6246R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 768 FPS | 762 FPS |
| medium | 640 FPS | 762 FPS |
| high | 577 FPS | 762 FPS |
| ultra | 504 FPS | 762 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 640 FPS | 762 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 720 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 665 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 596 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 469 FPS | 516 FPS |
| medium | 377 FPS | 423 FPS |
| high | 336 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 280 FPS | 306 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | Xeon Gold 6246R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 774 FPS | 762 FPS |
| medium | 774 FPS | 762 FPS |
| high | 704 FPS | 762 FPS |
| ultra | 616 FPS | 739 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 730 FPS | 762 FPS |
| medium | 644 FPS | 762 FPS |
| high | 549 FPS | 673 FPS |
| ultra | 474 FPS | 568 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 677 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 592 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 511 FPS |
| ultra | 362 FPS | 428 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX and Xeon Gold 6246R


Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
The Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,954 points. Launch price was $1,299.

Xeon Gold 6246R
Xeon Gold 6246R
The Xeon Gold 6246R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,468 points. Launch price was $3,286.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6246R offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6246R — a 2.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX (base: 3 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6246R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX scores 30,954 against the Xeon Gold 6246R's 30,468 — a 1.6% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 29,045 vs 16,000 (57.9% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,240 vs 1,293, a 4.2% lead for the Xeon Gold 6246R that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,241 vs 9,848 (30.5% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6246R). L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6246R.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | Xeon Gold 6246R |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+2% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.4 GHz+13% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+79% | 35.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 16 MB+3100% |
| Process | 12 nm-14% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 30,954+2% | 30,468 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 29,045+82% | 16,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,240 | 1,293+4% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,241 | 9,848+36% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6246R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2933 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6246R). PCIe lanes: 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6246R) — the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX) and Lewisburg (Xeon Gold 6246R).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | Xeon Gold 6246R |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB+100% | 1024 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 6+50% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 64+33% | 48 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Gold 6246R supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6246R). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX targets Extreme Multi-threaded Workstation, Xeon Gold 6246R targets High-frequency Server / Financial. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX rivals Core i9-7940X; Xeon Gold 6246R rivals EPYC 7302.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | Xeon Gold 6246R |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Extreme Multi-threaded Workstation | High-frequency Server / Financial |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












