
T550 Mobile
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 465
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The T550 Mobile is positioned at rank 45 and the Radeon Pro 465 is on rank 152, so the T550 Mobile offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar T550 Mobile
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 465
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The T550 Mobile is significantly newer (2022 vs 2016). The T550 Mobile likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro 465 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The T550 Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 465.
| Insight | T550 Mobile | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the T550 Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of T550 Mobile and Radeon Pro 465
T550 Mobile
The T550 Mobile is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 23W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,764 points.

Radeon Pro 465
The Radeon Pro 465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,538 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the T550 Mobile scores 4,764 versus the Radeon Pro 465's 4,538 — the T550 Mobile leads by 5%. The T550 Mobile is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro 465 uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (T550 Mobile) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 465). Raw compute: 3.41 TFLOPS (T550 Mobile) vs 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 465). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 907 MHz.
| Feature | T550 Mobile | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,764+5% | 4,538 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.41 TFLOPS+84% | 1.858 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+84% | 907 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | T550 Mobile | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | T550 Mobile | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The T550 Mobile draws 23W versus the Radeon Pro 465's 35W — a 41.4% difference. The T550 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (T550 Mobile) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 465). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | T550 Mobile | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 23W-34% | 35W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 207.1+60% | 129.7 |
Value Analysis
The T550 Mobile is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | T550 Mobile | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $150 |
| Codename | TU117 | Baffin |
| Release | Maio 2022 | October 30 2016 |
| Ranking | #452 | #547 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














