T550 Mobile
VS
Radeon Pro Vega 16

T550 Mobile vs Radeon Pro Vega 16

T550 Mobile

2022Core: 1065 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 16

2018Core: 815 MHzBoost: 1190 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The T550 Mobile is positioned at rank #45 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Great cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar T550 Mobile

#16
Radeon RX 7600S
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
97%
#35
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
182%
#37
165%
#38
165%
#42
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
150%
#43
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
149%
#45
T550 Mobile
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#46
Radeon RX 5500M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100
100%
#48
GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
99%
#49
GeForce 610M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20
98%
#50
GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $75
98%
#53
GeForce GTX 980M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80
95%
#54
GeForce GTX 770M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
94%
#58
GeForce 770M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the T550 Mobile offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightT550 MobileRadeon Pro Vega 16
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)
Leading raw performance (+0.9%)
Longevity
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro Vega 16 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of T550 Mobile and Radeon Pro Vega 16

T550 Mobile

The T550 Mobile is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 23W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,764 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 16

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,809 points.

Graphics Performance

The T550 Mobile scores 4,764 and the Radeon Pro Vega 16 reaches 4,809 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The T550 Mobile is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses GCN 5.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (T550 Mobile) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Raw compute: 3.41 TFLOPS (T550 Mobile) vs 2.437 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1190 MHz.

FeatureT550 MobileRadeon Pro Vega 16
G3D Mark Score
4,764
4,809
Architecture
Turing
GCN 5.0
Process Node
12 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1024
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.41 TFLOPS+40%
2.437 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1665 MHz+40%
1190 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64
64
L1 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureT550 MobileRadeon Pro Vega 16
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The T550 Mobile comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 0 MB. The T550 Mobile offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureT550 MobileRadeon Pro Vega 16
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The T550 Mobile draws 23W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 16's 75W — a 106.1% difference. The T550 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (T550 Mobile) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureT550 MobileRadeon Pro Vega 16
TDP
23W-69%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
207.1+223%
64.1
💰

Value Analysis

The T550 Mobile is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2018).

FeatureT550 MobileRadeon Pro Vega 16
MSRP
$0
Avg Price (30d)
$0
Codename
TU117
Vega 12
Release
Maio 2022
November 14 2018
Ranking
#452
#451