CPU
GPU
T550 Mobile
Popular choices:
RTXA5000-24Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The T550 Mobile is positioned at rank 45 and the RTXA5000-24Q is on rank 331, so the T550 Mobile offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar T550 Mobile
Performance Per Dollar RTXA5000-24Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTXA5000-24Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the T550 Mobile.
| Insight | T550 Mobile | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTXA5000-24Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of T550 Mobile and RTXA5000-24Q
T550 Mobile
The T550 Mobile is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 23W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,764 points.
RTXA5000-24Q
The RTXA5000-24Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,803 points.
Graphics Performance
The T550 Mobile scores 4,764 and the RTXA5000-24Q reaches 4,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The T550 Mobile is built on Turing while the RTXA5000-24Q uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (T550 Mobile) vs 8,192 (RTXA5000-24Q). Raw compute: 3.41 TFLOPS (T550 Mobile) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-24Q). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1695 MHz.
| Feature | T550 Mobile | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,764 | 4,803 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 8192+700% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.41 TFLOPS | 27.77 TFLOPS+714% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1695 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 64 | 256+300% |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 8 MB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 6 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | T550 Mobile | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (T550 Mobile) vs 6 MB (RTXA5000-24Q) — the RTXA5000-24Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | T550 Mobile | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 6 MB+500% |
Power & Dimensions
The T550 Mobile draws 23W versus the RTXA5000-24Q's 230W — a 163.6% difference. The T550 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (T550 Mobile) vs 350W (RTXA5000-24Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | T550 Mobile | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 23W-90% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 207.1+891% | 20.9 |
Value Analysis
The T550 Mobile is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | T550 Mobile | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $3721 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $2100 |
| Codename | TU117 | GA102 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #452 | #53 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on T550 Mobile and RTXA5000-24Q
