Tesla C2050 / C2070 vs GeForce GTX 485M SLI
Tesla C2050 / C2070
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 485M SLI
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is positioned at rank 327 and the GeForce GTX 485M SLI is on rank 227, so the GeForce GTX 485M SLI offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla C2050 / C2070
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 485M SLI
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (6 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 485M SLI.
| Insight | Tesla C2050 / C2070 | GeForce GTX 485M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+200%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (248mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Tesla C2050 / C2070 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla C2050 / C2070 and GeForce GTX 485M SLI
Tesla C2050 / C2070
The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,428 points.
GeForce GTX 485M SLI
The GeForce GTX 485M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 575 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,360 points.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla C2050 / C2070 scores 3,428 and the GeForce GTX 485M SLI reaches 3,360 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTX 485M SLI uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 448 (Tesla C2050 / C2070) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 485M SLI).
| Feature | Tesla C2050 / C2070 | GeForce GTX 485M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,428+2% | 3,360 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 448 | 768+71% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla C2050 / C2070 | GeForce GTX 485M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Tesla C2050 / C2070 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 485M SLI has 2 GB. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Tesla C2050 / C2070 | GeForce GTX 485M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+200% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_0 (Tesla C2050 / C2070) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 485M SLI). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | Tesla C2050 / C2070 | GeForce GTX 485M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_0 | 12 (11_0)+9% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla C2050 / C2070 draws 238W versus the GeForce GTX 485M SLI's 100W — a 81.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 485M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla C2050 / C2070) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 485M SLI). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Tesla C2050 / C2070 | GeForce GTX 485M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 238W | 100W-58% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 248mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 92°C |
| Perf/Watt | 14.4 | 33.6+133% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla C2050 / C2070 and GeForce GTX 485M SLI
