Tesla C2050 / C2070 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

Tesla C2050 / C2070

2011Core: 574 MHz

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

2013Core: 980 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Tesla C2050 / C2070

238

3,428

+0.4%

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER

GeForce RTX 5060

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

134

3,415

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER

GeForce RTX 5060

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is positioned at rank #327 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Tesla C2050 / C2070

#311

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

10783%

#326

Quadro FX 380

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

100%

#327

Tesla C2050 / C2070

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30

100%

#328

FirePro M7740

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

97%

#329

Quadro FX 570

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

95%

#330

RTXA5000-24Q

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100

94%

#331

GRID P40-1Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

93%

#333

Tesla M10

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500

93%

#334

Tesla C2050

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $95

93%

#335

FirePro S10000

MSRP: $3599|Avg: $500

92%

#336

Quadro FX 3450

MSRP: $119|Avg: $30

91%

#337

GRID P40-24Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $200

91%

#338

Quadro 4000

MSRP: $1199|Avg: $30

90%

#339

FireStream 9250

MSRP: $999|Avg: $49

85%

#340

GRID P40-3Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699

84%

#341

GRID M10-2Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150

79%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (6 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST.

Insight	Tesla C2050 / C2070	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+200%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	Standard Size (248mm)	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Tesla C2050 / C2070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Tesla C2050 / C2070 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $50), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 67.3% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Tesla C2050 / C2070	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+67.3%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($30)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Tesla C2050 / C2070 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Tesla C2050 / C2070 and GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

Tesla C2050 / C2070

The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,428 points.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 134W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,415 points. Launch price was $169.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Tesla C2050 / C2070 scores 3,428 and the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST reaches 3,415 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 448 (Tesla C2050 / C2070) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Raw compute: 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2050 / C2070) vs 1.585 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST).

Feature	Tesla C2050 / C2070	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
G3D Mark Score	3,428	3,415
Architecture	Fermi	Kepler
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	448	768+71%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.028 TFLOPS	1.585 TFLOPS+54%
ROPs	48+100%	24
TMUs	56	64+14%
L1 Cache	896 KB+1300%	64 KB
L2 Cache	768 KB+100%	384 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Tesla C2050 / C2070	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Tesla C2050 / C2070 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST has 2 GB. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Tesla C2050 / C2070) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) — the Tesla C2050 / C2070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Tesla C2050 / C2070	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+200%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	768 KB+100%	384 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (Tesla C2050 / C2070) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

Feature	Tesla C2050 / C2070	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
DirectX	11_0	12 (FL 11_0)+9%
Max Displays	1	4+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Tesla C2050 / C2070 draws 238W versus the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST's 134W — a 55.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla C2050 / C2070) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 248mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	Tesla C2050 / C2070	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
TDP	238W	134W-44%
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	248mm	241mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	—	97°C
Perf/Watt	14.4	25.5+77%

💰

Value Analysis

The Tesla C2050 / C2070 launched at $2499 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST launched at $169 and now averages $50. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 costs 40% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 114.3 (Tesla C2050 / C2070) vs 68.3 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) — the Tesla C2050 / C2070 offers 67.3% better value. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).