
Tesla C2050 / C2070 vs Quadro 7000

Tesla C2050 / C2070
Popular choices:

Quadro 7000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is positioned at rank 327 and the Quadro 7000 is on rank 398, so the Tesla C2050 / C2070 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla C2050 / C2070
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 7000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 7000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla C2050 / C2070.
| Insight | Tesla C2050 / C2070 | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (248mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tesla C2050 / C2070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Tesla C2050 / C2070 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $300), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 878% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla C2050 / C2070 | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+878%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla C2050 / C2070 and Quadro 7000

Tesla C2050 / C2070
The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,428 points.

Quadro 7000
The Quadro 7000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 2 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 651 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,505 points. Launch price was $14,499.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla C2050 / C2070 scores 3,428 and the Quadro 7000 reaches 3,505 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is built on Fermi while the Quadro 7000 uses Fermi 2.0, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 448 (Tesla C2050 / C2070) vs 512 (Quadro 7000). Raw compute: 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2050 / C2070) vs 1.3322 TFLOPS (Quadro 7000).
| Feature | Tesla C2050 / C2070 | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,428 | 3,505+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 448 | 512+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.028 TFLOPS | 1.3322 TFLOPS+30% |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 56 | 64+14% |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB | 896 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla C2050 / C2070 | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 6 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Tesla C2050 / C2070 | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla C2050 / C2070 draws 238W versus the Quadro 7000's 204W — a 15.4% difference. The Quadro 7000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla C2050 / C2070) vs 350W (Quadro 7000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Tesla C2050 / C2070 | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 238W | 204W-14% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 248mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 14.4 | 17.2+19% |
Value Analysis
The Tesla C2050 / C2070 launched at $2499 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Quadro 7000 launched at $14499 and now averages $300. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 costs 90% less ($270 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 114.3 (Tesla C2050 / C2070) vs 11.7 (Quadro 7000) — the Tesla C2050 / C2070 offers 876.9% better value. The Quadro 7000 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2011).
| Feature | Tesla C2050 / C2070 | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499-83% | $14499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-90% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 114.3+877% | 11.7 |
| Codename | GF100 | GF110 |
| Release | July 25 2011 | May 2 2012 |
| Ranking | #569 | #541 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















