Tesla C2050 / C2070 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tesla C2050 / C2070
Popular choices:
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is positioned at rank 327 and the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is on rank 150, so the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla C2050 / C2070
Performance Per Dollar Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2011). The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (6 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.
| Insight | Tesla C2050 / C2070 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+200%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (248mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tesla C2050 / C2070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $50 for the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7, it costs 40% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 68.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla C2050 / C2070 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+68.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla C2050 / C2070 and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tesla C2050 / C2070
The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,428 points.
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla C2050 / C2070 scores 3,428 and the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 reaches 3,390 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is built on Fermi while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 40 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 448 (Tesla C2050 / C2070) vs 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).
| Feature | Tesla C2050 / C2070 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,428+1% | 3,390 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 448+367% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla C2050 / C2070 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Tesla C2050 / C2070 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 has 2 GB. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Tesla C2050 / C2070 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+200% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_0 (Tesla C2050 / C2070) vs 12.1 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | Tesla C2050 / C2070 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_0 | 12.1+10% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla C2050 / C2070 draws 238W versus the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7's 30W — a 155.2% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla C2050 / C2070) vs 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 248mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Tesla C2050 / C2070 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 238W | 30W-87% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 248mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 14.4 | 113.0+685% |
Value Analysis
The Tesla C2050 / C2070 launched at $2499 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 launched at $100 and now averages $50. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 costs 40% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 114.3 (Tesla C2050 / C2070) vs 67.8 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) — the Tesla C2050 / C2070 offers 68.6% better value. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2011).
| Feature | Tesla C2050 / C2070 | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $100-96% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-40% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 114.3+69% | 67.8 |
| Codename | GF100 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | July 25 2011 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #569 | #508 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla C2050 / C2070 and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
