Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Tesla C2050 / C2070 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

Tesla C2050 / C2070

2011Core: 574 MHz
Similar parts
····
Buy on Amazon
VS

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

2020
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

Tesla C2050 / C2070 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Performance Spectrum

Tesla C2050 / C2070
6 GB 238
3,428
+1.1%
brand logoGeForce GTX 570M
brand logoGeForce GTX 460
brand logoGeForce GTX 465
brand logoGeForce GTX 675MX
brand logoGeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2 GB 30
3,390
0.0%
brand logoRadeon R7 450
brand logoRadeon HD 6970M
brand logoRadeon HD 8770
brand logoRadeon HD 6990
brand logoGeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
brand logoRadeon RX 6600 XT
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Tesla C2050 / C2070 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Tesla C2050 / C2070

2011

Why buy it

  • ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2011 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    2399% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,499 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 33.9 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • ❌693.3% higher power demand at 238W vs 30W.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

2020

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $2,399 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 2371.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.9 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
  • ✅Tesla C2050 / C2070 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 30W instead of 238W, a 208W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Tesla C2050 / C2070 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (3,428 vs 3,390), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 10nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,399 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $2,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2371.3% (33.9 vs 1.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Tesla C2050 / C2070 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Tesla C2050 / C2070 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Tesla C2050 / C2070

The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,428 points.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Tesla C2050 / C2070 scores 3,428 and the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 reaches 3,390 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is built on Fermi while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 40 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 448 (Tesla C2050 / C2070) vs 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).

FeatureTesla C2050 / C2070Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
G3D Mark Score
3,428+1%
3,390
Architecture
Fermi
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node
40 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
448+367%
96
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureTesla C2050 / C2070Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Tesla C2050 / C2070 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 carries 2 GB. Tesla C2050 / C2070 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Tesla C2050 / C2070 and 64-bit on the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.

FeatureTesla C2050 / C2070Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+200%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (Tesla C2050 / C2070) vs 12.1 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

FeatureTesla C2050 / C2070Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
DirectX
11_0
12.1+10%
Max Displays
1
4+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Tesla C2050 / C2070 draws 238W versus the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7's 30W — a 155.2% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla C2050 / C2070) vs 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 248mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureTesla C2050 / C2070Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
TDP
238W
30W-87%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
248mm
0mm
Height
—
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
—
85
Perf/Watt
14.4
113.0+685%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Tesla C2050 / C2070 came in at $2499, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 launched at $100. On MSRP, Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 was 96% cheaper ($2399 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (Tesla C2050 / C2070) vs 33.9 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) — the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 offers 2321.4% better value. The newer card here is Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 (2020 vs 2011).

FeatureTesla C2050 / C2070Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
MSRP
$2499
$100-96%
Performance per Dollar
1.4
33.9+2321%
Codename
GF100
Tiger Lake Xe
Release
July 25 2011
August 15 2020
Ranking
#569
#508
Search Tesla C2050 / C2070 on AmazonSearch Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.