
Radeon RX 550 (móvel)

Tesla C2050 / C2070
Radeon RX 550 (móvel) vs Tesla C2050 / C2070 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon RX 550 (móvel) vs Tesla C2050 / C2070 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Radeon RX 550 (móvel) vs Tesla C2050 / C2070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon RX 550 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,420 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3129.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.3 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Tesla C2050 / C2070 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 550 (móvel) is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 238W, a 188W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Tesla C2050 / C2070
2011Why buy it
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2011 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌3063.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 44.3 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
- ❌376% higher power demand at 238W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 550 (móvel) vs Tesla C2050 / C2070 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon RX 550 (móvel)
The Radeon RX 550 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1287 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points. Launch price was $79.99.

Tesla C2050 / C2070
The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,428 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 550 (móvel) scores 3,500 and the Tesla C2050 / C2070 reaches 3,428 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 550 (móvel) is built on GCN 4.0 while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 uses Fermi, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon RX 550 (móvel)) vs 448 (Tesla C2050 / C2070). Raw compute: 1.647 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550 (móvel)) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2050 / C2070).
| Feature | Radeon RX 550 (móvel) | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,500+2% | 3,428 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+43% | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.647 TFLOPS+60% | 1.028 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 40 | 56+40% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 896 KB+460% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 550 (móvel) is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 550 (móvel) | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 550 (móvel) has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 carries 6 GB. Tesla C2050 / C2070 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon RX 550 (móvel) and 64-bit on the Tesla C2050 / C2070. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon RX 550 (móvel)) vs 768 KB (Tesla C2050 / C2070) — the Tesla C2050 / C2070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 550 (móvel) | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 6 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 550 (móvel) draws 50W versus the Tesla C2050 / C2070's 238W — a 130.6% difference. The Radeon RX 550 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 550 (móvel)) vs 350W (Tesla C2050 / C2070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX 550 (móvel) | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-79% | 238W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 248mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 70.0+386% | 14.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon RX 550 (móvel) came in at $79, while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 launched at $2499. On MSRP, Radeon RX 550 (móvel) was 96.8% cheaper ($2420 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.3 (Radeon RX 550 (móvel)) vs 1.4 (Tesla C2050 / C2070) — the Radeon RX 550 (móvel) offers 3064.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 550 (móvel) (2017 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon RX 550 (móvel) | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $79-97% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.3+3064% | 1.4 |
| Codename | Lexa | GF100 |
| Release | July 2 2017 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #614 | #569 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














