FirePro W7170M vs Radeon RX 550 (móvel)

FirePro W7170M

2015Core: 723 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 550 (móvel)

2017Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1287 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro W7170M vs Radeon RX 550 (móvel) Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W7170M vs Radeon RX 550 (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W7170M

2015

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
  • 100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

Radeon RX 550 (móvel)

2017

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • FirePro W7170M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 550 (móvel) is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro W7170M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3% in PassMark G3D (3,605 vs 3,500), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 550 (móvel) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) and FSR Frame Generation (2023), while FirePro W7170M is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 550 (móvel) makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. FirePro W7170M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro W7170M vs Radeon RX 550 (móvel) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W7170M

The FirePro W7170M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 2 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,605 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 550 (móvel)

The Radeon RX 550 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1287 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points. Launch price was $79.99.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W7170M scores 3,605 and the Radeon RX 550 (móvel) reaches 3,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W7170M is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon RX 550 (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro W7170M) vs 640 (Radeon RX 550 (móvel)). Raw compute: 2.961 TFLOPS (FirePro W7170M) vs 1.647 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550 (móvel)).

FeatureFirePro W7170MRadeon RX 550 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score
3,605+3%
3,500
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2048+220%
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.961 TFLOPS+80%
1.647 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
128+220%
40
L1 Cache
512 KB+220%
160 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 550 (móvel) is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The FirePro W7170M does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

FeatureFirePro W7170MRadeon RX 550 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W7170M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 550 (móvel) carries 2 GB. FirePro W7170M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W7170M and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 550 (móvel).

FeatureFirePro W7170MRadeon RX 550 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W7170M draws 100W versus the Radeon RX 550 (móvel)'s 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon RX 550 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7170M) vs 350W (Radeon RX 550 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureFirePro W7170MRadeon RX 550 (móvel)
TDP
100W
50W-50%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
36.0
70.0+94%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon RX 550 (móvel) (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureFirePro W7170MRadeon RX 550 (móvel)
MSRP
$79
Codename
Amethyst
Lexa
Release
October 2 2015
July 2 2017
Ranking
#533
#614

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.