Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire vs Tesla C2050 / C2070
Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
Popular choices:
Tesla C2050 / C2070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is positioned at rank 479 and the Tesla C2050 / C2070 is on rank 327, so the Tesla C2050 / C2070 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
Performance Per Dollar Tesla C2050 / C2070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Tesla C2050 / C2070 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Terascale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+200%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (248mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tesla C2050 / C2070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Tesla C2050 / C2070 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $150), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 389.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+389.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire and Tesla C2050 / C2070
Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 12 2011. It features the Terascale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 2240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points.
Tesla C2050 / C2070
The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,428 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire scores 3,500 and the Tesla C2050 / C2070 reaches 3,428 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is built on Terascale 2 while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 2,240 (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire) vs 448 (Tesla C2050 / C2070).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,500+2% | 3,428 |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2240+400% | 448 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 has 6 GB. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 6 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire) vs 11_0 (Tesla C2050 / C2070). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 6+500% | 1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire draws 50W versus the Tesla C2050 / C2070's 238W — a 130.6% difference. The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire) vs 350W (Tesla C2050 / C2070). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 248mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-79% | 238W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 248mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 70.0+386% | 14.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire launched at $699 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 launched at $2499 and now averages $30. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 costs 80% less ($120 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.3 (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire) vs 114.3 (Tesla C2050 / C2070) — the Tesla C2050 / C2070 offers 390.6% better value.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699-72% | $2499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $30-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.3 | 114.3+391% |
| Codename | Blackcomb XTX | GF100 |
| Release | July 12 2011 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #517 | #569 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire and Tesla C2050 / C2070
