Tesla C2050 / C2070 vs GeForce GTX 590

Tesla C2050 / C2070

2011Core: 574 MHz

GeForce GTX 590

2011Core: 607 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Tesla C2050 / C2070

238

3,428

+2.6%

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER

GeForce RTX 5060

GeForce GTX 590

365

3,341

0.0%

GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER

GeForce RTX 5060

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is positioned at rank #327 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Tesla C2050 / C2070

#311

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

10783%

#326

Quadro FX 380

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

100%

#327

Tesla C2050 / C2070

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30

100%

#328

FirePro M7740

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

97%

#329

Quadro FX 570

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

95%

#330

RTXA5000-24Q

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100

94%

#331

GRID P40-1Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

93%

#333

Tesla M10

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500

93%

#334

Tesla C2050

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $95

93%

#335

FirePro S10000

MSRP: $3599|Avg: $500

92%

#336

Quadro FX 3450

MSRP: $119|Avg: $30

91%

#337

GRID P40-24Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $200

91%

#338

Quadro 4000

MSRP: $1199|Avg: $30

90%

#339

FireStream 9250

MSRP: $999|Avg: $49

85%

#340

GRID P40-3Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699

84%

#341

GRID M10-2Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150

79%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (6 GB vs 3 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 590.

Insight	Tesla C2050 / C2070	GeForce GTX 590
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	Standard Size (248mm)	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Tesla C2050 / C2070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Tesla C2050 / C2070 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $100), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 242% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Tesla C2050 / C2070	GeForce GTX 590
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+242%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($30)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Tesla C2050 / C2070 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 590 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Tesla C2050 / C2070 and GeForce GTX 590

Tesla C2050 / C2070

The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,428 points.

GeForce GTX 590

The GeForce GTX 590 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,341 points. Launch price was $699.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Tesla C2050 / C2070 scores 3,428 and the GeForce GTX 590 reaches 3,341 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTX 590 uses Fermi 2.0, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 448 (Tesla C2050 / C2070) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 590). Raw compute: 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2050 / C2070) vs 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX 590).

Feature	Tesla C2050 / C2070	GeForce GTX 590
G3D Mark Score	3,428+3%	3,341
Architecture	Fermi	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	448	1024 ×2+129%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.028 TFLOPS	1.244 TFLOPS ×2+21%
ROPs	48	48 ×2
TMUs	56	64 ×2+14%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	1 MB+14%
L2 Cache	768 KB	768 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Tesla C2050 / C2070	GeForce GTX 590
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Tesla C2050 / C2070 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 590 has 3 GB. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.

Feature	Tesla C2050 / C2070	GeForce GTX 590
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+100%	3 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	768 KB	768 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11_0 (Tesla C2050 / C2070) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 590). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

Feature	Tesla C2050 / C2070	GeForce GTX 590
DirectX	11_0	12 (11_0)+9%
Max Displays	1	4+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Tesla C2050 / C2070 draws 238W versus the GeForce GTX 590's 365W — a 42.1% difference. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla C2050 / C2070) vs 700W (GeForce GTX 590). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin.

Feature	Tesla C2050 / C2070	GeForce GTX 590
TDP	238W-35%	365W
Recommended PSU	350W-50%	700W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 8-pin
Length	248mm	—
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	—	90°C
Perf/Watt	14.4+57%	9.2

💰

Value Analysis

The Tesla C2050 / C2070 launched at $2499 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce GTX 590 launched at $699 and now averages $100. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 costs 70% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 114.3 (Tesla C2050 / C2070) vs 33.4 (GeForce GTX 590) — the Tesla C2050 / C2070 offers 242.2% better value.