Tesla C2050 / C2070
VS
Radeon E8870PCIe

Tesla C2050 / C2070 vs Radeon E8870PCIe

NVIDIA

Tesla C2050 / C2070

2011Core: 574 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon E8870PCIe

2014Core: 575 MHzBoost: 625 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is positioned at rank 327 and the Radeon E8870PCIe is on rank 327, so the Radeon E8870PCIe offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Tesla C2050 / C2070

#311
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
10783%
#326
Quadro FX 380
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
100%
#327
Tesla C2050 / C2070
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30
100%
#328
FirePro M7740
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
97%
#329
Quadro FX 570
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
95%
#330
RTXA5000-24Q
MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100
94%
#331
GRID P40-1Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
93%
#333
Tesla M10
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
93%
#334
Tesla C2050
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $95
93%
#335
FirePro S10000
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $500
92%
#336
Quadro FX 3450
MSRP: $119|Avg: $30
91%
#337
GRID P40-24Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $200
91%
#338
Quadro 4000
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $30
90%
#339
FireStream 9250
MSRP: $999|Avg: $49
85%
#340
GRID P40-3Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699
84%
#341
GRID M10-2Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
79%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon E8870PCIe

#317
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
806%
#319
731%
#320
729%
#324
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
663%
#325
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
658%
#327
Radeon E8870PCIe
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
100%
#330
Arc Graphics 140T
MSRP: $350|Avg: $300
95%
#331
Radeon 680M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80
95%
#333
GeForce 730A
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
95%
#334
GeForce GT 745A
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
93%
#335
GeForce 710A
MSRP: $35|Avg: $62
92%
#336
91%
#338
GeForce MX230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
90%
#340
RADEON HD6410D
MSRP: $35|Avg: $5
90%
#341
GeForce 820M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
89%
#342
Radeon R7 M465X
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (6 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon E8870PCIe.

InsightTesla C2050 / C2070Radeon E8870PCIe
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.8%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+200%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (248mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Tesla C2050 / C2070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Tesla C2050 / C2070 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $200), it costs 85% less, resulting in a 578.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightTesla C2050 / C2070Radeon E8870PCIe
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+578.5%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($30)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Tesla C2050 / C2070 and Radeon E8870PCIe

NVIDIA

Tesla C2050 / C2070

The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,428 points.

AMD

Radeon E8870PCIe

The Radeon E8870PCIe is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 25 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 37W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,368 points.

Graphics Performance

The Tesla C2050 / C2070 scores 3,428 and the Radeon E8870PCIe reaches 3,368 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is built on Fermi while the Radeon E8870PCIe uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 448 (Tesla C2050 / C2070) vs 640 (Radeon E8870PCIe). Raw compute: 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2050 / C2070) vs 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon E8870PCIe).

FeatureTesla C2050 / C2070Radeon E8870PCIe
G3D Mark Score
3,428+2%
3,368
Architecture
Fermi
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
448
640+43%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.028 TFLOPS+28%
0.8 TFLOPS
ROPs
48+200%
16
TMUs
56+40%
40
L1 Cache
896 KB+460%
160 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureTesla C2050 / C2070Radeon E8870PCIe
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Tesla C2050 / C2070 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon E8870PCIe has 2 GB. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Tesla C2050 / C2070) vs 256 KB (Radeon E8870PCIe) — the Tesla C2050 / C2070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureTesla C2050 / C2070Radeon E8870PCIe
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+200%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Tesla C2050 / C2070 draws 238W versus the Radeon E8870PCIe's 37W — a 146.2% difference. The Radeon E8870PCIe is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla C2050 / C2070) vs 350W (Radeon E8870PCIe). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureTesla C2050 / C2070Radeon E8870PCIe
TDP
238W
37W-84%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
248mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
14.4
91.0+532%
💰

Value Analysis

The Tesla C2050 / C2070 launched at $2499 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon E8870PCIe launched at $250 and now averages $200. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 costs 85% less ($170 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 114.3 (Tesla C2050 / C2070) vs 16.8 (Radeon E8870PCIe) — the Tesla C2050 / C2070 offers 580.4% better value. The Radeon E8870PCIe is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).

FeatureTesla C2050 / C2070Radeon E8870PCIe
MSRP
$2499
$250-90%
Avg Price (30d)
$30-85%
$200
Performance per Dollar
114.3+580%
16.8
Codename
GF100
Venus
Release
July 25 2011
January 25 2014
Ranking
#569
#734