Tesla C2070 vs Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU
Tesla C2070
Popular choices:
Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Tesla C2070 is positioned at rank #287 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla C2070
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU is significantly newer (2018 vs 2011). The Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla C2070 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla C2070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (6 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU.
| Insight | Tesla C2070 | Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (248mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Tesla C2070 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla C2070 and Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU
Tesla C2070
The Tesla C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,121 points.
Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU
The Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,035 points.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla C2070 scores 3,121 and the Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU reaches 3,035 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | Tesla C2070 | Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,121+3% | 3,035 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 7 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla C2070 | Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Tesla C2070 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU has 0 MB. The Tesla C2070 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Tesla C2070 | Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Tesla C2070) vs 12.1 (Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU). OpenGL: 4.6 vs ES 3.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.
| Feature | Tesla C2070 | Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+44% | ES 3.2 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 3+200% |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Tesla C2070) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU).
| Feature | Tesla C2070 | Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | VPU |
| Decoder | — | VPU |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla C2070 draws 238W versus the Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU's 7W — a 188.6% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla C2070) vs 1W (Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Tesla C2070 | Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 238W | 7W-97% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 248mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 13.1 | 433.6+3210% |
Value Analysis
The Tesla C2070 launched at $1499 MSRP and currently averages $38, while the Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU costs 100+% less ($38 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 82.1 (Tesla C2070) vs Infinity (Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU) — the Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU offers Infinity% better value. The Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2011).
| Feature | Tesla C2070 | Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $38 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 82.1 | Infinity |
| Codename | GF100 | — |
| Release | July 25 2011 | December 6 2018 |
| Ranking | #575 | #916 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla C2070 and Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU
